Individualized mean arterial pressure during cardiac surgery The OPTIPAM Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Whether targeting an individualized mean arterial pressure (MAP) during cardiac surgery improves outcomes remains uncertain. The balance between improved perfusion and vasopressor-driven blood pressure augmentation is unclear. METHODS: In this single-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in 10 tertiary centers in France, adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were assigned to either individualized MAP management (target within ±10% of preoperative baseline during surgery and for 24 h postoperatively) or standard management (target MAP ≥65 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, acute kidney injury, or prespecified neurologic complications within 7 days. Safety outcomes included hemorrhagic complications and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were enrolled before the trial was stopped early by the data and safety monitoring board because of increased bleeding in the individualized group. Mean intraoperative MAP was higher with individualized management (80.6 vs 75.6 mm Hg; P<0.001), despite limited target adherence (33% of intraoperative time) and greater vasopressor use. The primary outcome occurred in 27 of 85 patients (32%) in the individualized group and 25 of 87 (29%) in the standard group (relative risk, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.8; P=0.76). Hemorrhagic complications occurred more frequently in the individualized group (18% vs 3%; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, it was not possible to determine whether an individualized MAP strategy reduced major postoperative complications. More bleeding complications were observed in the individualized group. Future studies should further investigate this safety signal when evaluating individualized blood pressure targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000006471
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Individualized mean arterial pressure during cardiac surgery The OPTIPAM Randomized Clinical Trial

Anaïs R. Briant, Martin Charvin, Richard Descamps, Géraldine Dessertaine et al.
4 links
Anesthesiology
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Individualized mean arterial pressure during cardiac surgery The OPTIPAM Randomized Clinical Trial

Anaïs R. Briant, Martin Charvin, Richard Descamps, Géraldine Dessertaine, Jean‐Jacques Parienti, Clémence Tomadesso, Stéphane Debroczi, Laure Cazenave, Paul‐Michel Mertès, Hélène Charbonneau, Olivier Desebbe, Marc‐Olivier Fischer, William Greub, Laure Peyro‐Saint‐Paul, Thomas LESTHIEVENT, Bertrand R Rozec, François Labaste, Diane Lena, A. Roche, Jean-Luc FELLAHI, for the OPTIPAM investigators
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether targeting an individualized mean arterial pressure (MAP) during cardiac surgery improves outcomes remains uncertain. The balance between improved perfusion and vasopressor-driven blood pressure augmentation is unclear. METHODS: In this single-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in 10 tertiary centers in France, adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were assigned to either individualized MAP management (target within ±10% of preoperative baseline during surgery and for 24 h postoperatively) or standard management (target MAP ≥65 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, acute kidney injury, or prespecified neurologic complications within 7 days. Safety outcomes included hemorrhagic complications and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were enrolled before the trial was stopped early by the data and safety monitoring board because of increased bleeding in the individualized group. Mean intraoperative MAP was higher with individualized management (80.6 vs 75.6 mm Hg; P<0.001), despite limited target adherence (33% of intraoperative time) and greater vasopressor use. The primary outcome occurred in 27 of 85 patients (32%) in the individualized group and 25 of 87 (29%) in the standard group (relative risk, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.8; P=0.76). Hemorrhagic complications occurred more frequently in the individualized group (18% vs 3%; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, it was not possible to determine whether an individualized MAP strategy reduced major postoperative complications. More bleeding complications were observed in the individualized group. Future studies should further investigate this safety signal when evaluating individualized blood pressure targets.

Anesthesiology
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR), Institut Arnault Tzanck (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR), Clinique Pasteur (FR), Institut du Thorax (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg (FR), RESTORE (FR), Université de Toulouse (FR), Université de Nantes (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon