Energy savings versus thermal comfort in existing Mediterranean office buildings: a case study assessing the effectiveness of low-impact retrofit strategies

Purpose Energy retrofit strategies based on non-invasive or minimally invasive measures are widely adopted in existing office buildings; however, their effectiveness is often assumed to be transferable across different climatic contexts. This study investigates energy savings and thermal comfort obtained by using commonly applied low-impact retrofit actions in existing Mediterranean office buildings. Design/methodology/approach A dynamic simulation model of an existing office building located in Southern Italy was developed to evaluate the impact of non-invasive retrofit measures, including indoor air temperature setpoint adjustments, daylight saving time strategies and the replacement of conventional boilers with air-to-water heat pumps. Energy performance was assessed in terms of heating, cooling and lighting demand, while thermal comfort was evaluated using Fanger theory. Findings The results show that setpoint adjustments provided the highest individual savings (up to 4.8%), followed by heat pump adoption (4.0%), while their combined application led to a maximum reduction of 7.7%. These savings seem limited since they refer to total annual primary energy consumption, but savings related to heating can reach up to 24–46%, while those related to cooling reach 18%. Moreover, a clear trade-off between energy savings and thermal comfort was identified, particularly during winter conditions. Research limitations/implications The analysis is based on a simulation model without calibration against measured data, although a good consistency with available benchmark data for office buildings has been obtained; therefore, results should be interpreted as a comparative assessment rather than absolute predictions. Practical implications The findings support decision-making in the management of existing buildings, highlighting both the potential and limitations of low-cost retrofit strategies. Originality/value The study provides an integrated evaluation of low-impact energy retrofit strategies, identifying a significant trade-off between energy savings and thermal comfort for existing Mediterranean office buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-05-2026-0398
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Energy savings versus thermal comfort in existing Mediterranean office buildings: a case study assessing the effectiveness of low-impact retrofit strategies

Federico Minelli, Diana D’Agostino, Francesco Minichiello, Claudia Pagano
1 links
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Energy savings versus thermal comfort in existing Mediterranean office buildings: a case study assessing the effectiveness of low-impact retrofit strategies

Federico Minelli, Diana D’Agostino, Francesco Minichiello, Claudia Pagano
article en

Abstract

Purpose Energy retrofit strategies based on non-invasive or minimally invasive measures are widely adopted in existing office buildings; however, their effectiveness is often assumed to be transferable across different climatic contexts. This study investigates energy savings and thermal comfort obtained by using commonly applied low-impact retrofit actions in existing Mediterranean office buildings. Design/methodology/approach A dynamic simulation model of an existing office building located in Southern Italy was developed to evaluate the impact of non-invasive retrofit measures, including indoor air temperature setpoint adjustments, daylight saving time strategies and the replacement of conventional boilers with air-to-water heat pumps. Energy performance was assessed in terms of heating, cooling and lighting demand, while thermal comfort was evaluated using Fanger theory. Findings The results show that setpoint adjustments provided the highest individual savings (up to 4.8%), followed by heat pump adoption (4.0%), while their combined application led to a maximum reduction of 7.7%. These savings seem limited since they refer to total annual primary energy consumption, but savings related to heating can reach up to 24–46%, while those related to cooling reach 18%. Moreover, a clear trade-off between energy savings and thermal comfort was identified, particularly during winter conditions. Research limitations/implications The analysis is based on a simulation model without calibration against measured data, although a good consistency with available benchmark data for office buildings has been obtained; therefore, results should be interpreted as a comparative assessment rather than absolute predictions. Practical implications The findings support decision-making in the management of existing buildings, highlighting both the potential and limitations of low-cost retrofit strategies. Originality/value The study provides an integrated evaluation of low-impact energy retrofit strategies, identifying a significant trade-off between energy savings and thermal comfort for existing Mediterranean office buildings.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Climate action, Affordable and clean energy, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon