Physically constrained tabular variational autoencoders for small sample blasting fragmentation data

Small blasting datasets challenge generative models because physical bounds, heterogeneous fragmentation regimes and algebraically related variables must be represented simultaneously. This study examines an existing 62-record fragmentation benchmark in which separate tabular variational autoencoders were fitted within fragmentation-index groups, with a Gaussian copula fallback for subsets smaller than 20 records. Eight engineering variables were generated, and fragmentation index was reconstructed by adding an empirical residual to the logarithm of the in-situ-block-size to fragment-size ratio. The reported workflow attained an overall SDV fidelity score of 0.8568, compared with 0.8261 for a pure TVAE and 0.8023 for Gaussian simulation. Train-on-synthetic-test-on-real regression produced R² = 0.7030 and mean absolute error = 0.0364 m, while the reverse transfer yielded R² = 0.1302. Reported support precision and recall were 0.9247 and 0.9194. These results favour the grouped workflow descriptively, especially for marginal fidelity, but do not isolate the contributions of grouping, reconstruction and rejection constraints. They also do not establish independent predictive validity because split chronology and task-specific predictor lists are incompletely documented. The classification label based on in-situ block size is a threshold proxy, rather than a measured post-blast oversize outcome, and can become circular if its defining variable is retained as an input. The analysis develops the assumptions behind residual reconstruction, interprets transfer asymmetry and specifies the additional validation needed to establish engineering utility without overstating the evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31224/8717
Primary Topic
Blasting Impact and Analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Physically constrained tabular variational autoencoders for small sample blasting fragmentation data

PAULO FILIPE T. LOPES
4 links
Blasting Impact and Analysis
preprint

Physically constrained tabular variational autoencoders for small sample blasting fragmentation data

PAULO FILIPE T. LOPES
preprint en

Abstract

Small blasting datasets challenge generative models because physical bounds, heterogeneous fragmentation regimes and algebraically related variables must be represented simultaneously. This study examines an existing 62-record fragmentation benchmark in which separate tabular variational autoencoders were fitted within fragmentation-index groups, with a Gaussian copula fallback for subsets smaller than 20 records. Eight engineering variables were generated, and fragmentation index was reconstructed by adding an empirical residual to the logarithm of the in-situ-block-size to fragment-size ratio. The reported workflow attained an overall SDV fidelity score of 0.8568, compared with 0.8261 for a pure TVAE and 0.8023 for Gaussian simulation. Train-on-synthetic-test-on-real regression produced R² = 0.7030 and mean absolute error = 0.0364 m, while the reverse transfer yielded R² = 0.1302. Reported support precision and recall were 0.9247 and 0.9194. These results favour the grouped workflow descriptively, especially for marginal fidelity, but do not isolate the contributions of grouping, reconstruction and rejection constraints. They also do not establish independent predictive validity because split chronology and task-specific predictor lists are incompletely documented. The classification label based on in-situ block size is a threshold proxy, rather than a measured post-blast oversize outcome, and can become circular if its defining variable is retained as an input. The analysis develops the assumptions behind residual reconstruction, interprets transfer asymmetry and specifies the additional validation needed to establish engineering utility without overstating the evidence.

Blasting Impact and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon