A Two-Dimensional Lumbar Load Estimation Model for Comparing Conceptual Assist Mechanisms

Lumbar assist suits are commonly evaluated based on reductions in muscle activity; however, such reductions do not necessarily correspond to decreases in intervertebral loading. This study developed a two-dimensional sagittal-plane static rigid-link model to evaluate relative changes in lumbar intervertebral loads during assist suit use. The model incorporated subject-specific spinal alignment based on age, sex, and height and estimated compressive force, shear force, and external flexion moment at each intervertebral level from L1/L2 to L5/S1. Three conceptual assist conditions—shoulder-traction assistance, extensor-muscle assistance, and lumbar stabilization—were compared at L4/L5 and L5/S1. The assist parameters were calibrated to reduce the L5/S1 ES-group force by 20% at 60° trunk flexion. Under shoulder-traction assistance, compressive force, shear force, and external flexion moment decreased at both L4/L5 and L5/S1. Under extensor-muscle assistance, erector spinae force decreased as prescribed, whereas the three intervertebral load components remained unchanged. Lumbar stabilization reduced compressive force and external flexion moment but slightly increased shear force. These findings demonstrate that similar reductions in erector spinae force can produce different changes in intervertebral loads depending on the mechanical assistance principle, highlighting the importance of considering multiple load components when evaluating and designing lumbar assist systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162111006
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Two-Dimensional Lumbar Load Estimation Model for Comparing Conceptual Assist Mechanisms

Ryojun Ikeura, Koki Mitsuiwa, Syunichi Yoshida, Soichiro Hayakawa
1 links
Applied Sciences
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

A Two-Dimensional Lumbar Load Estimation Model for Comparing Conceptual Assist Mechanisms

Ryojun Ikeura, Koki Mitsuiwa, Syunichi Yoshida, Soichiro Hayakawa
article en

Abstract

Lumbar assist suits are commonly evaluated based on reductions in muscle activity; however, such reductions do not necessarily correspond to decreases in intervertebral loading. This study developed a two-dimensional sagittal-plane static rigid-link model to evaluate relative changes in lumbar intervertebral loads during assist suit use. The model incorporated subject-specific spinal alignment based on age, sex, and height and estimated compressive force, shear force, and external flexion moment at each intervertebral level from L1/L2 to L5/S1. Three conceptual assist conditions—shoulder-traction assistance, extensor-muscle assistance, and lumbar stabilization—were compared at L4/L5 and L5/S1. The assist parameters were calibrated to reduce the L5/S1 ES-group force by 20% at 60° trunk flexion. Under shoulder-traction assistance, compressive force, shear force, and external flexion moment decreased at both L4/L5 and L5/S1. Under extensor-muscle assistance, erector spinae force decreased as prescribed, whereas the three intervertebral load components remained unchanged. Lumbar stabilization reduced compressive force and external flexion moment but slightly increased shear force. These findings demonstrate that similar reductions in erector spinae force can produce different changes in intervertebral loads depending on the mechanical assistance principle, highlighting the importance of considering multiple load components when evaluating and designing lumbar assist systems.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Mie University (JP)
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon