Racial, Ethnic, and Regional Influences on National Patterns of Mammographic Screening

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether there were clinically significant disparities in screening mammography rates according to race, ethnicity, and United States geographic region in patients with access to health care systems. METHODS: We queried the Cosmos Epic national database to ascertain mammographic screening rates for women aged 50 to 65 who had 1 or more ambulatory encounters with a primary care physician between November 9, 2020, and November 8, 2023. Patients with a previous breast cancer and those with missing race or ethnicity data were excluded. RESULTS: The overall mammographic screening rate was 63.8% in the 7,837,164 individuals who met study criteria. There were no clinically meaningful differences in screening according to race. However, screening was less frequent in those with Hispanic ethnicity versus non-Hispanic (58.9% vs. 64.3%, P<0.001). Rates also varied according to region, with the lowest rates in the West (55.5%, P<0.001). Screening rates for Black and White groups were within 5% of one another in all 4 regions. With respect to ethnicity, the South was the only region where the Hispanic population rate had a lower rate over 5% (61.8% vs. 55.7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients receiving health care in the US do not receive recommended mammogram screening, but there were no clinically significant differences by race. Lower rates were noted in Hispanic populations, particularly in the South. Targeted educational and community outreach efforts in this region are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000001400
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Racial, Ethnic, and Regional Influences on National Patterns of Mammographic Screening

Shane M. Mesko, Emily C. Soriano, Abigail Lin, Thomas A. Buchholz et al.
2 links
American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Racial, Ethnic, and Regional Influences on National Patterns of Mammographic Screening

Shane M. Mesko, Emily C. Soriano, Abigail Lin, Thomas A. Buchholz, Samantha R. Spierling Bagsic, Athena Philis‐Tsimikas, Adelaide Fortmann, Cammie Nguyen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether there were clinically significant disparities in screening mammography rates according to race, ethnicity, and United States geographic region in patients with access to health care systems. METHODS: We queried the Cosmos Epic national database to ascertain mammographic screening rates for women aged 50 to 65 who had 1 or more ambulatory encounters with a primary care physician between November 9, 2020, and November 8, 2023. Patients with a previous breast cancer and those with missing race or ethnicity data were excluded. RESULTS: The overall mammographic screening rate was 63.8% in the 7,837,164 individuals who met study criteria. There were no clinically meaningful differences in screening according to race. However, screening was less frequent in those with Hispanic ethnicity versus non-Hispanic (58.9% vs. 64.3%, P<0.001). Rates also varied according to region, with the lowest rates in the West (55.5%, P<0.001). Screening rates for Black and White groups were within 5% of one another in all 4 regions. With respect to ethnicity, the South was the only region where the Hispanic population rate had a lower rate over 5% (61.8% vs. 55.7%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients receiving health care in the US do not receive recommended mammogram screening, but there were no clinically significant differences by race. Lower rates were noted in Hispanic populations, particularly in the South. Targeted educational and community outreach efforts in this region are warranted.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Scripps Health (US), Scripps Clinic Medical Group (US), Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon