“ What We Do is Hard” : A Mixed-Methods Study of Singing Teachers’ Occupational Vocal Demands

Despite facing an elevated risk of developing voice disorders, singing teachers remain an under-researched group of occupational voice users, limiting opportunities for early intervention, education, and professional support. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study investigated the occupational vocal demands and vocal health of singing teachers across multiple musical styles and locations. Phase 1 consisted of a predominantly quantitative online survey (N = 107), and Phase 2 employed a focus group (N = 6) to provide further insight into key findings. Seventy‑two percent of participants had experienced a voice problem (self-reported), and 36% reported a medically diagnosed voice problem. The mean Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10) score was 11.52 (SD = 6.04), indicating a mild to moderate perceived singing handicap. Factors associated with better vocal health included increased teacher age and experience, private studio teaching, and inclusion of adult students. Poorer vocal health was associated with teaching school-aged students, teaching musical theatre, teaching more days per week, and more voice use outside work. Qualitative findings indicated tension between high physiological vocal demands and a social and financial imperative to maintain vocal health. Overall, this study highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing both the vocal demands and psycho-social pressures faced by singing teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voice and Speech Review
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2026.2760183
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

“ What We Do is Hard” : A Mixed-Methods Study of Singing Teachers’ Occupational Vocal Demands

Anna M. Girardi, Melissa Forbes, Emma Kate Wilson
Voice and Speech Review
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

“ What We Do is Hard” : A Mixed-Methods Study of Singing Teachers’ Occupational Vocal Demands

Anna M. Girardi, Melissa Forbes, Emma Kate Wilson
article en

Abstract

Despite facing an elevated risk of developing voice disorders, singing teachers remain an under-researched group of occupational voice users, limiting opportunities for early intervention, education, and professional support. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study investigated the occupational vocal demands and vocal health of singing teachers across multiple musical styles and locations. Phase 1 consisted of a predominantly quantitative online survey (N = 107), and Phase 2 employed a focus group (N = 6) to provide further insight into key findings. Seventy‑two percent of participants had experienced a voice problem (self-reported), and 36% reported a medically diagnosed voice problem. The mean Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 (SVHI-10) score was 11.52 (SD = 6.04), indicating a mild to moderate perceived singing handicap. Factors associated with better vocal health included increased teacher age and experience, private studio teaching, and inclusion of adult students. Poorer vocal health was associated with teaching school-aged students, teaching musical theatre, teaching more days per week, and more voice use outside work. Qualitative findings indicated tension between high physiological vocal demands and a social and financial imperative to maintain vocal health. Overall, this study highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing both the vocal demands and psycho-social pressures faced by singing teachers.

Voice and Speech Review
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Australian Government, University of Southern Queensland
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon