Hyoid fracture and judicial outcomes in alleged strangulation deaths: Mixed-methods analysis of Indian High Court and Supreme Court judgments (2024–2025)

Background Hyoid bone findings are frequently discussed in court judgments involving alleged strangulation/neck compression, yet their documentation and judicial interpretation vary. We examined whether hyoid fracture status is associated with judgment outcome and how hyoid-related arguments are used in judicial reasoning. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted using Indian High Court/Supreme Court (HC/SC) judgments (2024–2025) retrieved from Indiankanoon.org . Quantitative analyses were performed on strangulation/neck compression judgments ( n = 370). Judgment outcomes were categorised and collapsed into accused-favourable versus prosecution/anti-accused-favourable outcomes. Victim-level analysis included 376 victims. Associations were examined using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests with odds ratios. A qualitative thematic synthesis was undertaken on the broader HC/SC hyoid corpus ( n = 500) to contextualise quantitative findings; key themes were summarised. Results Accused-favourable outcomes were less frequent in cases with documented hyoid fracture than in intact/not-mentioned cases (47.2% vs. 62.7%; OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.81; p = 0.003). In accused-side applications, high weightage to literature-linked hyoid arguments was associated with lower accused success in fracture cases (OR = 0.40) but higher success in intact/not-mentioned cases (OR = 2.39), suggesting effect modification by fracture status. Victim-level analyses showed fracture was more frequent when manual/throttling was alleged compared to ligature strangulation (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34–3.52; Fisher's exact p = 0.0022). Qualitative synthesis identified recurrent judicial reliance on hyoid fracture as a decisive sign, variable use of literature, and documentation gaps influencing interpretation. Conclusions Hyoid fracture documentation is associated with judicial outcomes and shapes argumentation strategies. Standardised forensic documentation and cautious interpretation of isolated hyoid findings are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine Science and the Law
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024261505247
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Hyoid fracture and judicial outcomes in alleged strangulation deaths: Mixed-methods analysis of Indian High Court and Supreme Court judgments (2024–2025)

Sonam Pal, Ajay Kumar, Deepak Herald D’Souza, Jyothi MP D’Souza
Medicine Science and the Law
Restraint-Related Deaths
article

Hyoid fracture and judicial outcomes in alleged strangulation deaths: Mixed-methods analysis of Indian High Court and Supreme Court judgments (2024–2025)

Sonam Pal, Ajay Kumar, Deepak Herald D’Souza, Jyothi MP D’Souza
article en

Abstract

Background Hyoid bone findings are frequently discussed in court judgments involving alleged strangulation/neck compression, yet their documentation and judicial interpretation vary. We examined whether hyoid fracture status is associated with judgment outcome and how hyoid-related arguments are used in judicial reasoning. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted using Indian High Court/Supreme Court (HC/SC) judgments (2024–2025) retrieved from Indiankanoon.org . Quantitative analyses were performed on strangulation/neck compression judgments ( n = 370). Judgment outcomes were categorised and collapsed into accused-favourable versus prosecution/anti-accused-favourable outcomes. Victim-level analysis included 376 victims. Associations were examined using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests with odds ratios. A qualitative thematic synthesis was undertaken on the broader HC/SC hyoid corpus ( n = 500) to contextualise quantitative findings; key themes were summarised. Results Accused-favourable outcomes were less frequent in cases with documented hyoid fracture than in intact/not-mentioned cases (47.2% vs. 62.7%; OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.81; p = 0.003). In accused-side applications, high weightage to literature-linked hyoid arguments was associated with lower accused success in fracture cases (OR = 0.40) but higher success in intact/not-mentioned cases (OR = 2.39), suggesting effect modification by fracture status. Victim-level analyses showed fracture was more frequent when manual/throttling was alleged compared to ligature strangulation (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34–3.52; Fisher's exact p = 0.0022). Qualitative synthesis identified recurrent judicial reliance on hyoid fracture as a decisive sign, variable use of literature, and documentation gaps influencing interpretation. Conclusions Hyoid fracture documentation is associated with judicial outcomes and shapes argumentation strategies. Standardised forensic documentation and cautious interpretation of isolated hyoid findings are warranted.

Medicine Science and the Law
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Jaipur National University (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Restraint-Related Deaths
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon