Fragmented Jurisdictions and the Delivery of More Sustainable Urban Form in Florida

Florida’s metropolitan growth crosses county and municipal boundaries, while implementation authority remains divided among local governments and specialized institutions. In this study I examined how jurisdictional fragmentation can weaken the institutional conditions for delivering more sustainable urban form in South Florida, metropolitan Orlando, and Tampa Bay. The analysis focused on four dimensions: contiguity, multimodal accessibility, infrastructure alignment, and environmental continuity; I did not measure regional sustainability outcomes. I drew evidence from public plans, agency records, transportation studies, statutes, ordinances, annexation and service records, and adopted fiscal and development-cost schedules. I organized these materials around four mechanisms: Two concern boundary and service reassignment and differences in adopted development-cost conditions; the other two concern cross-boundary transportation dependent on local land use implementation and regional coordination without equivalent binding implementation responsibility. Transportation provided the strongest evidence: Metropolitan movement and corridor systems depend on implementation powers divided among institutions. Regional coordination can extend across a wider geography than the institutions responsible for carrying it into implementation. Annexation and fiscal records provide narrower evidence of boundary, service, and adopted cost differences. In this study I did not infer annexation motives or developer relocation and did not establish parcel-level causation or final urban-form outcomes. When a planning issue crosses jurisdictional or agency boundaries, planners should identify the geography over which it operates and the decisions needed for implementation. They should then identify who controls those decisions and where implementation crosses institutional boundaries. Responsibility for alignment should also be clear. This allows fragmentation to be reviewed without assuming every boundary is a problem or metropolitan consolidation is the answer.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34937574
Primary Topic
Local Governance and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Fragmented Jurisdictions and the Delivery of More Sustainable Urban Form in Florida

Rafik Ibrahim
Figshare
Local Governance and Planning
article

Fragmented Jurisdictions and the Delivery of More Sustainable Urban Form in Florida

Rafik Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

Florida’s metropolitan growth crosses county and municipal boundaries, while implementation authority remains divided among local governments and specialized institutions. In this study I examined how jurisdictional fragmentation can weaken the institutional conditions for delivering more sustainable urban form in South Florida, metropolitan Orlando, and Tampa Bay. The analysis focused on four dimensions: contiguity, multimodal accessibility, infrastructure alignment, and environmental continuity; I did not measure regional sustainability outcomes. I drew evidence from public plans, agency records, transportation studies, statutes, ordinances, annexation and service records, and adopted fiscal and development-cost schedules. I organized these materials around four mechanisms: Two concern boundary and service reassignment and differences in adopted development-cost conditions; the other two concern cross-boundary transportation dependent on local land use implementation and regional coordination without equivalent binding implementation responsibility. Transportation provided the strongest evidence: Metropolitan movement and corridor systems depend on implementation powers divided among institutions. Regional coordination can extend across a wider geography than the institutions responsible for carrying it into implementation. Annexation and fiscal records provide narrower evidence of boundary, service, and adopted cost differences. In this study I did not infer annexation motives or developer relocation and did not establish parcel-level causation or final urban-form outcomes. When a planning issue crosses jurisdictional or agency boundaries, planners should identify the geography over which it operates and the decisions needed for implementation. They should then identify who controls those decisions and where implementation crosses institutional boundaries. Responsibility for alignment should also be clear. This allows fragmentation to be reviewed without assuming every boundary is a problem or metropolitan consolidation is the answer.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Local Governance and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon