Incremental value of a cross-dataset ulcer-region prior for infection and ischaemia classification in diabetic foot ulcer image patches

Objective To assess whether a DFUC2022-derived soft ulcer-region prior improves four-class infection/ischaemia label prediction in ulcer-centred DFUC2021 patches, using comparators matched for classifier architecture or base-model outputs. Methods We analysed 5, 955 labelled patches using five fixed image-similarity-grouped outer folds and five training seeds. CNN checkpoint selection and stacker fitting and selection excluded each outer evaluation fold. Three incremental comparisons assessed Full lesion-prior transfer (LPT) against an architecture-matched neutral-prior control, reliability-aware LPT (RA-LPT) against its output-only stack, and strong RGB stacks with versus without explicit prior features. Pointwise 95% confidence intervals and approximate two-sided p values were obtained from 5, 000 paired crossed seed × similarity-group bootstrap resamples; p values were Holm-adjusted across the three comparisons. Results Full LPT achieved Macro-F1 of 0.8921 ± 0.0059 versus 0.8777 ± 0.0085 for neutral Full LPT (mean ± sample SD across seeds). The mean paired difference was +0.0144 (95% CI, + 0.0048 to +0.0244; Holm-adjusted approximate p = 0.0132), positive in all five seeds. RA-LPT achieved Macro-F1 of 0.9181 ± 0.0038 versus 0.9206 ± 0.0028 for its corresponding output-only stack, without demonstrating an incremental improvement (difference, −0.0026; 95% CI, −0.0066 to +0.0012; adjusted p = 0.3079). Adding explicit prior features to the strong RGB stack also did not demonstrate an improvement in Macro-F1 (−0.0016; 95% CI, −0.0057 to +0.0025; adjusted p = 0.4223). The strong RGB stack achieved 0.9370 ± 0.0050, above Full LPT. In a later exploratory training-size analysis, Full LPT and its neutral control improved with increasing labelled-training budgets; mean Full LPT-minus-neutral Macro-F1 differences were positive at all four budgets, but all pointwise 95% confidence intervals included zero. Conclusion In the main five-seed evaluation, sample-specific prior information improved Full LPT relative to its architecture-matched neutral control. Its incremental value was comparator-dependent: additional explicit prior features showed no confirmed improvement beyond the evaluated model-output stacks. Patient identifiers and target-domain lesion masks were unavailable; these internal development findings require patient-linked, multicentre external validation before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1944475
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Incremental value of a cross-dataset ulcer-region prior for infection and ischaemia classification in diabetic foot ulcer image patches

Wanjin Fu, Nuojin Wang, Ajuan Gong, Yijun Du et al.
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Incremental value of a cross-dataset ulcer-region prior for infection and ischaemia classification in diabetic foot ulcer image patches

Wanjin Fu, Nuojin Wang, Ajuan Gong, Yijun Du, Tianrong Pan, Wenjing Li, Yue Wang, Xiaoqun Xu, Xiaomin Huang
article en

Abstract

Objective To assess whether a DFUC2022-derived soft ulcer-region prior improves four-class infection/ischaemia label prediction in ulcer-centred DFUC2021 patches, using comparators matched for classifier architecture or base-model outputs. Methods We analysed 5, 955 labelled patches using five fixed image-similarity-grouped outer folds and five training seeds. CNN checkpoint selection and stacker fitting and selection excluded each outer evaluation fold. Three incremental comparisons assessed Full lesion-prior transfer (LPT) against an architecture-matched neutral-prior control, reliability-aware LPT (RA-LPT) against its output-only stack, and strong RGB stacks with versus without explicit prior features. Pointwise 95% confidence intervals and approximate two-sided p values were obtained from 5, 000 paired crossed seed × similarity-group bootstrap resamples; p values were Holm-adjusted across the three comparisons. Results Full LPT achieved Macro-F1 of 0.8921 ± 0.0059 versus 0.8777 ± 0.0085 for neutral Full LPT (mean ± sample SD across seeds). The mean paired difference was +0.0144 (95% CI, + 0.0048 to +0.0244; Holm-adjusted approximate p = 0.0132), positive in all five seeds. RA-LPT achieved Macro-F1 of 0.9181 ± 0.0038 versus 0.9206 ± 0.0028 for its corresponding output-only stack, without demonstrating an incremental improvement (difference, −0.0026; 95% CI, −0.0066 to +0.0012; adjusted p = 0.3079). Adding explicit prior features to the strong RGB stack also did not demonstrate an improvement in Macro-F1 (−0.0016; 95% CI, −0.0057 to +0.0025; adjusted p = 0.4223). The strong RGB stack achieved 0.9370 ± 0.0050, above Full LPT. In a later exploratory training-size analysis, Full LPT and its neutral control improved with increasing labelled-training budgets; mean Full LPT-minus-neutral Macro-F1 differences were positive at all four budgets, but all pointwise 95% confidence intervals included zero. Conclusion In the main five-seed evaluation, sample-specific prior information improved Full LPT relative to its architecture-matched neutral control. Its incremental value was comparator-dependent: additional explicit prior features showed no confirmed improvement beyond the evaluated model-output stacks. Patient identifiers and target-domain lesion masks were unavailable; these internal development findings require patient-linked, multicentre external validation before clinical use.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 17
Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon