How Philae became ‘Egyptian’: UNESCO, Egypt and the engineering of World Heritage

Who has heritage been for? During the 1970s, engineers cut apart the Graeco-Roman temple complex on the Egyptian island of Philae and reassembled it on the neighbouring islet of Agilkia. This work formed the final part of UNESCO's International Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia, launched in 1960 in the face of flooding due to be caused by Egypt's construction of the Aswan High Dam. The campaign, which constituted a major influence on the 1972 World Heritage Convention, mobilized an international group of missions to conduct preservation and archaeological work in the contiguous regions of Egyptian and Sudanese Nubia. Much of this work reified a colonial vision of Nubia's past, with Nubians themselves forced to migrate elsewhere and ancient temples preserved in place. Yet it also materialized a solution to arguments between European and Egyptian experts. This article argues that at Philae, the Egyptian government used this situation to its advantage, recreating the colonial vision of Nubia to its own satisfaction. Using the precedent of the campaign's earlier work – and utilizing irrigation and engineering expertise garnered during the High Dam's construction – Egyptian experts argued that the Philae complex should be moved rather than kept in position using a series of dikes. That argument translated an Egyptian political and financial decision into a technical one, allowing Egypt to use heritage both to incorporate a marginal population into the state and to promote tourist development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and Anthropology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2026.2757253
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How Philae became ‘Egyptian’: UNESCO, Egypt and the engineering of World Heritage

William Carruthers
History and Anthropology
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

How Philae became ‘Egyptian’: UNESCO, Egypt and the engineering of World Heritage

William Carruthers
article en

Abstract

Who has heritage been for? During the 1970s, engineers cut apart the Graeco-Roman temple complex on the Egyptian island of Philae and reassembled it on the neighbouring islet of Agilkia. This work formed the final part of UNESCO's International Campaign to Save the Monuments of Nubia, launched in 1960 in the face of flooding due to be caused by Egypt's construction of the Aswan High Dam. The campaign, which constituted a major influence on the 1972 World Heritage Convention, mobilized an international group of missions to conduct preservation and archaeological work in the contiguous regions of Egyptian and Sudanese Nubia. Much of this work reified a colonial vision of Nubia's past, with Nubians themselves forced to migrate elsewhere and ancient temples preserved in place. Yet it also materialized a solution to arguments between European and Egyptian experts. This article argues that at Philae, the Egyptian government used this situation to its advantage, recreating the colonial vision of Nubia to its own satisfaction. Using the precedent of the campaign's earlier work – and utilizing irrigation and engineering expertise garnered during the High Dam's construction – Egyptian experts argued that the Philae complex should be moved rather than kept in position using a series of dikes. That argument translated an Egyptian political and financial decision into a technical one, allowing Egypt to use heritage both to incorporate a marginal population into the state and to promote tourist development.

History and Anthropology
University of Essex (GB)
University of Essex
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon