The skills and behaviours underpinning interoperability within the JESIP Joint Doctrine

In 2012, the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Programme (JESIP) was established to set a national standard for joint working across emergency services. The JESIP Joint Doctrine is the programme's central policy document, setting out the principles and expectations for effective multi-agency working. However, research has identified a gap between these principles and their application in practice. This study sought to identify the skills and behaviours underpinning interoperability within the JESIP Joint Doctrine and consider how its content might be refined to better support multi-agency working. A qualitative document analysis of the Joint Doctrine (Version 3.1) was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach to thematic analysis. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Core Processes Underpinning Interoperability; (2) Key Activities Across the Incident Lifecycle; and (3) Organisational Structures Shaping the Response. Drawing on these findings, six recommendations were formulated for potential revisions to the doctrine to better support multi-agency operations. These include giving greater prominence to communication and decision-making, clarifying the incident lifecycle, recognising the psychological challenges associated with implementing the doctrine, and strengthening opportunities for continuous joint learning. Overall, the findings provide a clearer understanding of how interoperability is represented within the JESIP Joint Doctrine and how its guidance might be refined to better support its application in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gcr68
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

The skills and behaviours underpinning interoperability within the JESIP Joint Doctrine

Nicola Power, Kayleigh Smith, Chloe Brennan, Sally Peplow et al.
2 links
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Disaster Management and Resilience
preprint

The skills and behaviours underpinning interoperability within the JESIP Joint Doctrine

Nicola Power, Kayleigh Smith, Chloe Brennan, Sally Peplow, Paul Christiansen
preprint en

Abstract

In 2012, the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Programme (JESIP) was established to set a national standard for joint working across emergency services. The JESIP Joint Doctrine is the programme's central policy document, setting out the principles and expectations for effective multi-agency working. However, research has identified a gap between these principles and their application in practice. This study sought to identify the skills and behaviours underpinning interoperability within the JESIP Joint Doctrine and consider how its content might be refined to better support multi-agency working. A qualitative document analysis of the Joint Doctrine (Version 3.1) was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach to thematic analysis. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Core Processes Underpinning Interoperability; (2) Key Activities Across the Incident Lifecycle; and (3) Organisational Structures Shaping the Response. Drawing on these findings, six recommendations were formulated for potential revisions to the doctrine to better support multi-agency operations. These include giving greater prominence to communication and decision-making, clarifying the incident lifecycle, recognising the psychological challenges associated with implementing the doctrine, and strengthening opportunities for continuous joint learning. Overall, the findings provide a clearer understanding of how interoperability is represented within the JESIP Joint Doctrine and how its guidance might be refined to better support its application in practice.

PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon