Classifying the State: Fiscal Legibility and Institutional Bypass in Post-Imperial Turkey, 1923–1950

How do post-imperial states claim fiscal sovereignty while relying on borrowing practices that complicate the transparency of public finance? This article introduces the concept of classification-based accommodation to explain how early Republican Turkey managed the tension between a sovereignty discourse of fiscal self-reliance and the financial demands of state-building. Drawing on an original dataset of 46 borrowing operations reconstructed from budget laws, final accounts, and parliamentary records, it argues that the state did not conceal its borrowing but rendered its aggregate fiscal position institutionally illegible. Major borrowing proceeds were legally authorized yet frequently absorbed into broad accounting categories, especially ‘extraordinary revenues under special laws’, producing an institutional bypass rather than a concealed executive design. The article shifts the analytical focus from the legibility of populations to the legibility of the state’s own fiscal position. Examining the multi-party transition after 1946, it shows that political competition politicized this classification regime without dismantling it, turning it into a contested object of parliamentary scrutiny.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2026.2755586
Primary Topic
Historical Turkish Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Classifying the State: Fiscal Legibility and Institutional Bypass in Post-Imperial Turkey, 1923–1950

Mehmet Selim Bağli
Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Historical Turkish Studies
article

Classifying the State: Fiscal Legibility and Institutional Bypass in Post-Imperial Turkey, 1923–1950

Mehmet Selim Bağli
article en

Abstract

How do post-imperial states claim fiscal sovereignty while relying on borrowing practices that complicate the transparency of public finance? This article introduces the concept of classification-based accommodation to explain how early Republican Turkey managed the tension between a sovereignty discourse of fiscal self-reliance and the financial demands of state-building. Drawing on an original dataset of 46 borrowing operations reconstructed from budget laws, final accounts, and parliamentary records, it argues that the state did not conceal its borrowing but rendered its aggregate fiscal position institutionally illegible. Major borrowing proceeds were legally authorized yet frequently absorbed into broad accounting categories, especially ‘extraordinary revenues under special laws’, producing an institutional bypass rather than a concealed executive design. The article shifts the analytical focus from the legibility of populations to the legibility of the state’s own fiscal position. Examining the multi-party transition after 1946, it shows that political competition politicized this classification regime without dismantling it, turning it into a contested object of parliamentary scrutiny.

Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Historical Turkish Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon