Telehealth for the Initial Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Perspectives of Patients, Healthcare Providers and Key Stakeholders Through Semi‐Structured Interviews in France

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and acceptability of remote care have now been demonstrated for many musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). However, the acceptability and potential uses of an initial remote evaluation for MSKDs have been scarcely studied and may be lower because of the loss of physical contact during the physical examination. OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of telehealth for the initial evaluation of MSKDs in France and to provide an in-depth understanding of its application, benefits and barriers. METHODS: Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted in France with patients, healthcare providers (family physicians, musculoskeletal medical specialists and physiotherapists), professional body representatives and telehealth software specialists. Five tailored interview guides adapted from a previous qualitative study were used. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and a reflexive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Participants found initial remote evaluations innovative for improving access but disagreed on the optimal scope and use. Four key themes were identified: (1) remote evaluation as a continuum from triage to diagnosis, conditioned by the perceived validity and feasibility of the adapted physical examination; (2) telehealth can complicate the patient-provider relationship; (3) videoconferencing is common, but its use in medical consultations may increase workload and burden; and (4) unlocking the full potential of telehealth requires coordinated planning and action as well as system-level support. CONCLUSIONS: Participants consistently identified remote triage as an acceptable initial stage in implementing remote evaluations for patients with MSKDs. Successful implementation will likely require targeted support for both patients and healthcare providers in conducting remote evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Musculoskeletal Care
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70303
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Telehealth for the Initial Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Perspectives of Patients, Healthcare Providers and Key Stakeholders Through Semi‐Structured Interviews in France

Jean‐Sébastien Roy, Kadija Perreault, Pauline Lemersre, Dahlia Kairy et al.
1 links
Musculoskeletal Care
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Telehealth for the Initial Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Perspectives of Patients, Healthcare Providers and Key Stakeholders Through Semi‐Structured Interviews in France

Jean‐Sébastien Roy, Kadija Perreault, Pauline Lemersre, Dahlia Kairy, Audrey‐Anne Cormier, Nicolas Pinsault, François Desmeules, Raphaël Vincent, Annie Bélanger, Valentin Coz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and acceptability of remote care have now been demonstrated for many musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). However, the acceptability and potential uses of an initial remote evaluation for MSKDs have been scarcely studied and may be lower because of the loss of physical contact during the physical examination. OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of telehealth for the initial evaluation of MSKDs in France and to provide an in-depth understanding of its application, benefits and barriers. METHODS: Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted in France with patients, healthcare providers (family physicians, musculoskeletal medical specialists and physiotherapists), professional body representatives and telehealth software specialists. Five tailored interview guides adapted from a previous qualitative study were used. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and a reflexive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Participants found initial remote evaluations innovative for improving access but disagreed on the optimal scope and use. Four key themes were identified: (1) remote evaluation as a continuum from triage to diagnosis, conditioned by the perceived validity and feasibility of the adapted physical examination; (2) telehealth can complicate the patient-provider relationship; (3) videoconferencing is common, but its use in medical consultations may increase workload and burden; and (4) unlocking the full potential of telehealth requires coordinated planning and action as well as system-level support. CONCLUSIONS: Participants consistently identified remote triage as an acceptable initial stage in implementing remote evaluations for patients with MSKDs. Successful implementation will likely require targeted support for both patients and healthcare providers in conducting remote evaluations.

Musculoskeletal CareVol. 24(4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA), Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA), Translational Innovation in Medicine and Complexity (FR), Université Laval (CA), Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Université de Montréal, Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon