Development and validation of an ideological-political literacy scale for university students in the New Era using multidimensional item response theory

Introduction Existing measures of ideological-political literacy among Chinese university students have limited dimensional clarity and cross-group comparability. This study developed and evaluated a five-dimensional scale covering political identification, patriotic sentiment, moral cultivation, rule-of-law awareness, and cultural confidence using multidimensional item response theory. Methods Framework-based qualitative coding, two-round Delphi consultation, content-validity screening, and pilot testing yielded 47 candidate items. A stratified cluster sample of 3,716 undergraduates from 28 universities across 12 provinces provided calibration data. A compensatory multidimensional graded response model (C-MGRM) was estimated by marginal maximum likelihood, with Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro estimation as a same-sample robustness check. Competing dimensional specifications, reliability, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined. Results The 47-item oblique model yielded RMSEA = 0.043, CFI = 0.957, and TLI = 0.951. After four items were removed, the final 43-item model yielded RMSEA = 0.039, CFI = 0.964, and TLI = 0.958; marginal reliabilities ranged from 0.82 to 0.91. Although bifactor models showed slightly better approximate fit, their indices did not support a substantive general-factor interpretation. Scalar invariance was reported across gender, grade, and disciplinary clusters. Eight items showed DIF across urban-rural or party-membership comparisons, leading to proposed wording revisions or interpretive caveats. Discussion The scale provides dimension-specific scores and a basis for further measurement development. Same-sample model selection, incomplete external-validity evidence, and unadjusted clustering in the MIRT and DIF analyses limit interpretation. Independent validation is needed, and the findings do not establish readiness for an operational computerized adaptive test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1896071
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development and validation of an ideological-political literacy scale for university students in the New Era using multidimensional item response theory

连桐, Wenzheng Zheng
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Development and validation of an ideological-political literacy scale for university students in the New Era using multidimensional item response theory

连桐, Wenzheng Zheng
article en

Abstract

Introduction Existing measures of ideological-political literacy among Chinese university students have limited dimensional clarity and cross-group comparability. This study developed and evaluated a five-dimensional scale covering political identification, patriotic sentiment, moral cultivation, rule-of-law awareness, and cultural confidence using multidimensional item response theory. Methods Framework-based qualitative coding, two-round Delphi consultation, content-validity screening, and pilot testing yielded 47 candidate items. A stratified cluster sample of 3,716 undergraduates from 28 universities across 12 provinces provided calibration data. A compensatory multidimensional graded response model (C-MGRM) was estimated by marginal maximum likelihood, with Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro estimation as a same-sample robustness check. Competing dimensional specifications, reliability, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined. Results The 47-item oblique model yielded RMSEA = 0.043, CFI = 0.957, and TLI = 0.951. After four items were removed, the final 43-item model yielded RMSEA = 0.039, CFI = 0.964, and TLI = 0.958; marginal reliabilities ranged from 0.82 to 0.91. Although bifactor models showed slightly better approximate fit, their indices did not support a substantive general-factor interpretation. Scalar invariance was reported across gender, grade, and disciplinary clusters. Eight items showed DIF across urban-rural or party-membership comparisons, leading to proposed wording revisions or interpretive caveats. Discussion The scale provides dimension-specific scores and a basis for further measurement development. Same-sample model selection, incomplete external-validity evidence, and unadjusted clustering in the MIRT and DIF analyses limit interpretation. Independent validation is needed, and the findings do not establish readiness for an operational computerized adaptive test.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Hebei University (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon