Families as subjects of need and knowledge: epistemic misrecognition in disability welfare policy in Norway

This article explores how Norwegian welfare policies aiming to ‘recognize families as resources’ align with the lived experiences of families caring for children with multiple disabilities. Drawing on qualitative data, the article examines parents’ experiences through a lens of professional family partnership and theories of epistemic injustice and social recognition. The article develops the notion of ‘epistemic misrecognition’ to describe three dimensions of feeling unacknowledged in these family accounts: families feel unheard in their testimony (testimonial misrecognition); they feel dismissed as relevant participants in inquiry (participatory misrecognition); and especially mothers experience misrecognition of their care-based expertise (misrecognition of experiential knowledge). These findings underscore both the importance of valuing families’ expertise in policy and practice and the barriers to doing so. While Norwegian next-of-kin policies recognise families as subjects of need, they are less able to acknowledge families as subjects of knowledge and fall short in granting families full epistemic standing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2755800
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Families as subjects of need and knowledge: epistemic misrecognition in disability welfare policy in Norway

Rosemarie van den Breemer
1 links
Disability & Society
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Families as subjects of need and knowledge: epistemic misrecognition in disability welfare policy in Norway

Rosemarie van den Breemer
article en

Abstract

This article explores how Norwegian welfare policies aiming to ‘recognize families as resources’ align with the lived experiences of families caring for children with multiple disabilities. Drawing on qualitative data, the article examines parents’ experiences through a lens of professional family partnership and theories of epistemic injustice and social recognition. The article develops the notion of ‘epistemic misrecognition’ to describe three dimensions of feeling unacknowledged in these family accounts: families feel unheard in their testimony (testimonial misrecognition); they feel dismissed as relevant participants in inquiry (participatory misrecognition); and especially mothers experience misrecognition of their care-based expertise (misrecognition of experiential knowledge). These findings underscore both the importance of valuing families’ expertise in policy and practice and the barriers to doing so. While Norwegian next-of-kin policies recognise families as subjects of need, they are less able to acknowledge families as subjects of knowledge and fall short in granting families full epistemic standing.

Disability & Society
University of Inland Norway (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon