Engineering Leadership Orientation and Perceived Organizational Enablement for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Iraq

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into engineering practice is bringing new dimensions to the role of a leader, including professional judgment, collaboration, and responsibility for decisions made with AI's support.However, desirable personal leadership orientations do not necessarily correlate with desirable work conditions.This study examines this perceived capability-enablement divide among engineers in Iraq.Survey data were collected from 144 engineers working in Iraq using 39 Likert-scale questions.The primary withinrespondent comparison used bootstrap estimation, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a cumulative ordinal fixedeffects model covering 5,616 item responses.Adjusted associations were examined using ordinary least squares regression with heteroskedasticity-consistent type 3 (HC3) standard errors and complete-profile permutation tests.Individual Leadership Orientation (ILO) was rated more favorably (M = 3.789, standard deviation [SD] = 0.435) than Organizational Enablement (OE) (M = 3.479, SD = 0.848).The mean paired difference was 0.309 points (95% bootstrap confidence interval [CI] [0.187, 0.443], p < .001;Cohen's d z = 0.394).Using the ordinal model, and controlling for respondent and item differences, the same directionality was found; that is, endorsement of Organizational Enablement was associated with lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.450, 95% CI [0.380, 0.534], p < .001).AI-use frequency was associated with ILO, but its association did not differ significantly from that with OE (p = .242).Education was associated much more strongly with individual orientation than enablement.The results suggest that there is a perceived gap in capability and enablement among the engineers participating, rather than any broad opposition to AI.The results indicate that leadership orientation and perceived organizational support are separate factors to consider when designing responsible AI implementation for engineering organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse050403
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Engineering Leadership Orientation and Perceived Organizational Enablement for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Iraq

Kasim A. Alomari, Mohammed N. Azeez, Faraj M. Katl
1 links
Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Engineering Leadership Orientation and Perceived Organizational Enablement for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Iraq

Kasim A. Alomari, Mohammed N. Azeez, Faraj M. Katl
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into engineering practice is bringing new dimensions to the role of a leader, including professional judgment, collaboration, and responsibility for decisions made with AI's support.However, desirable personal leadership orientations do not necessarily correlate with desirable work conditions.This study examines this perceived capability-enablement divide among engineers in Iraq.Survey data were collected from 144 engineers working in Iraq using 39 Likert-scale questions.The primary withinrespondent comparison used bootstrap estimation, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a cumulative ordinal fixedeffects model covering 5,616 item responses.Adjusted associations were examined using ordinary least squares regression with heteroskedasticity-consistent type 3 (HC3) standard errors and complete-profile permutation tests.Individual Leadership Orientation (ILO) was rated more favorably (M = 3.789, standard deviation [SD] = 0.435) than Organizational Enablement (OE) (M = 3.479, SD = 0.848).The mean paired difference was 0.309 points (95% bootstrap confidence interval [CI] [0.187, 0.443], p < .001;Cohen's d z = 0.394).Using the ordinal model, and controlling for respondent and item differences, the same directionality was found; that is, endorsement of Organizational Enablement was associated with lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.450, 95% CI [0.380, 0.534], p < .001).AI-use frequency was associated with ILO, but its association did not differ significantly from that with OE (p = .242).Education was associated much more strongly with individual orientation than enablement.The results suggest that there is a perceived gap in capability and enablement among the engineers participating, rather than any broad opposition to AI.The results indicate that leadership orientation and perceived organizational support are separate factors to consider when designing responsible AI implementation for engineering organizations.

Journal of Engineering Management and Systems EngineeringVol. 5(4)
University of Technology - Iraq (IQ), Thi Qar University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon