Metabolic syndrome and liver fibrosis in nondiabetic MASLD: A cross-sectional double machine learning study

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with hepatic fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), but whether this association is causal in nondiabetic MASLD has not been assessed with semiparametric causal methods. We analyzed 1306 nondiabetic adults with MASLD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 to 2020; 959 (73.4%) had prediabetes. The contrast was the supra-threshold MetS phenotype (≥3/5 harmonized components) versus the subthreshold phenotype (0-2/5), estimated as a covariate-standardized stratum contrast. Three co-primary outcomes were prespecified: fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) ≥ 1.3, age-residualized FIB-4, and age-independent FibroScan ≥ 7.9 kPa. We applied double machine learning, augmented inverse probability weighting, causal forests, and 4 meta-learners, with 20 robustness analyses prespecified and 9 added at peer review. Estimates diverged with the age dependence of the outcome. For FIB-4 the adjusted risk difference was 0.153 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.057-0.250; P = .002; E value = 3.75), or 0.095 (0.050-0.140) under a constant-effect specification; across 10 specifications estimates ranged from 0.078 to 0.163, attenuating to 0.091 (95% CI, -0.018 to 0.201; P = .10) after age residualization and to 0.001 (95% CI, -0.094 to 0.097; P = .98) for FibroScan, whose interval excludes the FIB-4 estimate at equal precision. Age stratification showed no effect below 40, with heterogeneity for FIB-4 (I2 = 72%) and age-residualized FIB-4 (I2 = 73%) but none for FibroScan (I2 = 0%), so the gradient is specific to FIB-4. Shapley decomposition ranked fasting glucose and central obesity highest, but every component's CI included zero, and no component pair showed additive-scale interaction after adjustment. Selection into the MASLD sample was exposure-dependent (40.7% vs 30.7%; P < .001); weighting gave 0.126 (0.003-0.250). The supra-threshold MetS phenotype was associated with a higher prevalence of FIB-4-defined fibrosis risk but not with age-independent elastography. The divergence tracks the outcome measure rather than sample composition: perturbations addressing what FIB-4 measures converge on 0.08 to 0.10, while those addressing sample composition leave it near 0.13 to 0.15. These findings generate hypotheses for confirmatory longitudinal testing rather than definitive causal evidence. They apply to the predominantly prediabetic MASLD population studied here and cannot be extrapolated to metabolically healthy or lean MASLD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051316
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Metabolic syndrome and liver fibrosis in nondiabetic MASLD: A cross-sectional double machine learning study

Lua Thi Ngo, Trung Huynh Van, Hien-Huu Tran
3 links
Medicine
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Metabolic syndrome and liver fibrosis in nondiabetic MASLD: A cross-sectional double machine learning study

Lua Thi Ngo, Trung Huynh Van, Hien-Huu Tran
article en

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with hepatic fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), but whether this association is causal in nondiabetic MASLD has not been assessed with semiparametric causal methods. We analyzed 1306 nondiabetic adults with MASLD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 to 2020; 959 (73.4%) had prediabetes. The contrast was the supra-threshold MetS phenotype (≥3/5 harmonized components) versus the subthreshold phenotype (0-2/5), estimated as a covariate-standardized stratum contrast. Three co-primary outcomes were prespecified: fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) ≥ 1.3, age-residualized FIB-4, and age-independent FibroScan ≥ 7.9 kPa. We applied double machine learning, augmented inverse probability weighting, causal forests, and 4 meta-learners, with 20 robustness analyses prespecified and 9 added at peer review. Estimates diverged with the age dependence of the outcome. For FIB-4 the adjusted risk difference was 0.153 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.057-0.250; P = .002; E value = 3.75), or 0.095 (0.050-0.140) under a constant-effect specification; across 10 specifications estimates ranged from 0.078 to 0.163, attenuating to 0.091 (95% CI, -0.018 to 0.201; P = .10) after age residualization and to 0.001 (95% CI, -0.094 to 0.097; P = .98) for FibroScan, whose interval excludes the FIB-4 estimate at equal precision. Age stratification showed no effect below 40, with heterogeneity for FIB-4 (I2 = 72%) and age-residualized FIB-4 (I2 = 73%) but none for FibroScan (I2 = 0%), so the gradient is specific to FIB-4. Shapley decomposition ranked fasting glucose and central obesity highest, but every component's CI included zero, and no component pair showed additive-scale interaction after adjustment. Selection into the MASLD sample was exposure-dependent (40.7% vs 30.7%; P < .001); weighting gave 0.126 (0.003-0.250). The supra-threshold MetS phenotype was associated with a higher prevalence of FIB-4-defined fibrosis risk but not with age-independent elastography. The divergence tracks the outcome measure rather than sample composition: perturbations addressing what FIB-4 measures converge on 0.08 to 0.10, while those addressing sample composition leave it near 0.13 to 0.15. These findings generate hypotheses for confirmatory longitudinal testing rather than definitive causal evidence. They apply to the predominantly prediabetic MASLD population studied here and cannot be extrapolated to metabolically healthy or lean MASLD.

MedicineVol. 105(45)
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Tam Anh General Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon