Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of the Protective Effects of Fluoridated Dental Materials on Enamel Surface Morphology under Artificial Demineralization

The primary aim of this in vitro study was to compare enamel surface morphology following standardized artificial demineralization among five protective dental materials and an untreated control. Specifically, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize acid-exposed and wax-protected enamel regions and to compare five-point ordinal surface-preservation scores across the six experimental groups. Fifty-four human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons provided 108 enamel surfaces. A 2 × 3 mm window was prepared on each surface, and specimens were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 18): control, APF gel containing 1.23 % fluoride ions, Enamel Pro Varnish containing 5 % sodium fluoride (NaF), Enamel Pro Prophy Paste with ACP, fluoride-releasing light-cured Pro Seal, and Duraphat containing 5 % sodium fluoride (NaF). Specimens were stored in artificial saliva and exposed to an artificial caries solution at pH 4.4 twice daily for 1 h over 30 days. After cycling, the surfaces were examined by SEM at ×500 and ×1500 magnifications. Images were morphologically classified and rated using a five-point ordinal surface-preservation scale, in which lower scores indicated better preservation. Data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Holm-adjusted Dunn comparisons. Mean ordinal SEM scores were 5.00, 3.72, 2.06, 3.06, 3.50, and 3.56 for Groups A–F, respectively, with an overall group difference (H(5) = 68.32, p < 0.001). Enamel Pro Varnish had the lowest mean ordinal SEM score (2.06), although its difference from Group D was not statistically significant after Holm adjustment (p = 0.115). Although all treated groups had more favourable ordinal SEM scores than the control, none reproduced the SEM appearance of untreated sound enamel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Science
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.ms.45785
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of the Protective Effects of Fluoridated Dental Materials on Enamel Surface Morphology under Artificial Demineralization

İdris Onur YALÇIN, İbrahim Erhan GELGÖR
Materials Science
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of the Protective Effects of Fluoridated Dental Materials on Enamel Surface Morphology under Artificial Demineralization

İdris Onur YALÇIN, İbrahim Erhan GELGÖR
article en

Abstract

The primary aim of this in vitro study was to compare enamel surface morphology following standardized artificial demineralization among five protective dental materials and an untreated control. Specifically, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize acid-exposed and wax-protected enamel regions and to compare five-point ordinal surface-preservation scores across the six experimental groups. Fifty-four human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons provided 108 enamel surfaces. A 2 × 3 mm window was prepared on each surface, and specimens were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 18): control, APF gel containing 1.23 % fluoride ions, Enamel Pro Varnish containing 5 % sodium fluoride (NaF), Enamel Pro Prophy Paste with ACP, fluoride-releasing light-cured Pro Seal, and Duraphat containing 5 % sodium fluoride (NaF). Specimens were stored in artificial saliva and exposed to an artificial caries solution at pH 4.4 twice daily for 1 h over 30 days. After cycling, the surfaces were examined by SEM at ×500 and ×1500 magnifications. Images were morphologically classified and rated using a five-point ordinal surface-preservation scale, in which lower scores indicated better preservation. Data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Holm-adjusted Dunn comparisons. Mean ordinal SEM scores were 5.00, 3.72, 2.06, 3.06, 3.50, and 3.56 for Groups A–F, respectively, with an overall group difference (H(5) = 68.32, p < 0.001). Enamel Pro Varnish had the lowest mean ordinal SEM score (2.06), although its difference from Group D was not statistically significant after Holm adjustment (p = 0.115). Although all treated groups had more favourable ordinal SEM scores than the control, none reproduced the SEM appearance of untreated sound enamel.

Materials Science
Usak University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon