ENTREPRENEURSHIP EXPLICATED IN THE MANNER OF PHILOSOPHERS

This essay presents a philosophical clarification regarding the nature of entrepreneurship, seeking to access its unapparent regions. Firstly, it analyzes its complex etymology; the forgetting of the original meaning (becoming the subject of one's own actions) and the predominance of capitalist ideology limit science to the study of effects, neglecting the causes. Subsequently, the dominant paradigm and its ideological biases (economism, organilogism, psychologism, and sociologism) are criticized, advocating for an integrated vision. The phenomenon is then discussed through its modes of appearance: the mode of being (essence) and the mode of seeing (technique). Finally, entrepreneurship is defined as a promise grounded in six elements: innovation, attitude, transformation, commitment, anguish, and freedom. It concludes that the main scientific barrier is the lack of transdisciplinarity. Without the integration of different fields of knowledge, entrepreneurship remains like a seed without soil: a daily reality that, although persistent, remains theoretically inaccessible and not materialized into full knowledge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Livre de Sustentabilidade e Empreendedorismo
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24002553
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

ENTREPRENEURSHIP EXPLICATED IN THE MANNER OF PHILOSOPHERS

Diego Luiz Teixeira Boava, Fernanda Maria Felício Macedo
Revista Livre de Sustentabilidade e Empreendedorismo
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

ENTREPRENEURSHIP EXPLICATED IN THE MANNER OF PHILOSOPHERS

Diego Luiz Teixeira Boava, Fernanda Maria Felício Macedo
article en

Abstract

This essay presents a philosophical clarification regarding the nature of entrepreneurship, seeking to access its unapparent regions. Firstly, it analyzes its complex etymology; the forgetting of the original meaning (becoming the subject of one's own actions) and the predominance of capitalist ideology limit science to the study of effects, neglecting the causes. Subsequently, the dominant paradigm and its ideological biases (economism, organilogism, psychologism, and sociologism) are criticized, advocating for an integrated vision. The phenomenon is then discussed through its modes of appearance: the mode of being (essence) and the mode of seeing (technique). Finally, entrepreneurship is defined as a promise grounded in six elements: innovation, attitude, transformation, commitment, anguish, and freedom. It concludes that the main scientific barrier is the lack of transdisciplinarity. Without the integration of different fields of knowledge, entrepreneurship remains like a seed without soil: a daily reality that, although persistent, remains theoretically inaccessible and not materialized into full knowledge.

Revista Livre de Sustentabilidade e Empreendedorismo
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon