Identifying monetary policy shocks under sign restrictions in Uzbekistan: A robustness reassessment

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractCounterintuitive responses of prices and exchange rates to monetary policy shocks are widely reported in transitional economies, yet whether these anomalies reflect the economy’s structure or the way the shock is identified remains unresolved. Using monthly data from January 2013 to July 2025, we test whether the anomalies survive under agnostic sign restrictions, not previously applied to Uzbek data, benchmarked against the recursive and zero contemporaneous schemes of our earlier studies. The recursive baseline reproduces both anomalies; the alternative schemes remove them, indicating they are largely artefacts of identification. This robustness differs sharply across variables. The absence of a price puzzle holds under sign restrictions across the full sample, alternative lag lengths, and both post-2017 and post-2020 subsamples, and it strengthens after each regime change. The absence of an exchange rate puzzle is directionally consistent – the currency never significantly depreciates when left unrestricted – but its magnitude and significance are fragile: the full-sample appreciation (roughly 1% at 12 months) is several times larger than in either subsample, and it loses significance once the September 2017 liberalization outlier is accounted for. We therefore do not find robust support for the exchange rate channel dominating the price channel. The contribution is methodological rather than descriptive: it shows which conclusions about Uzbek monetary transmission survive a change of identification, and that this robustness itself varies by variable. For policy, the results support continued use of sterilized foreign exchange interventions to smooth volatility, but not robust support for explicit exchange rate targeting.AcknowledgmentThis study was conducted at the Széll Kálmán Public Finance Lab of the Ludovika University of Public Service. Thank you for the university’s support.The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan does not bear responsibility for the content of the article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Banks and Bank Systems
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(4).2026.12
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Identifying monetary policy shocks under sign restrictions in Uzbekistan: A robustness reassessment

Csaba Lentner, Judit Sági, Elyor Davlatov
3 links
Banks and Bank Systems
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Identifying monetary policy shocks under sign restrictions in Uzbekistan: A robustness reassessment

Csaba Lentner, Judit Sági, Elyor Davlatov
article en

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractCounterintuitive responses of prices and exchange rates to monetary policy shocks are widely reported in transitional economies, yet whether these anomalies reflect the economy’s structure or the way the shock is identified remains unresolved. Using monthly data from January 2013 to July 2025, we test whether the anomalies survive under agnostic sign restrictions, not previously applied to Uzbek data, benchmarked against the recursive and zero contemporaneous schemes of our earlier studies. The recursive baseline reproduces both anomalies; the alternative schemes remove them, indicating they are largely artefacts of identification. This robustness differs sharply across variables. The absence of a price puzzle holds under sign restrictions across the full sample, alternative lag lengths, and both post-2017 and post-2020 subsamples, and it strengthens after each regime change. The absence of an exchange rate puzzle is directionally consistent – the currency never significantly depreciates when left unrestricted – but its magnitude and significance are fragile: the full-sample appreciation (roughly 1% at 12 months) is several times larger than in either subsample, and it loses significance once the September 2017 liberalization outlier is accounted for. We therefore do not find robust support for the exchange rate channel dominating the price channel. The contribution is methodological rather than descriptive: it shows which conclusions about Uzbek monetary transmission survive a change of identification, and that this robustness itself varies by variable. For policy, the results support continued use of sterilized foreign exchange interventions to smooth volatility, but not robust support for explicit exchange rate targeting.AcknowledgmentThis study was conducted at the Széll Kálmán Public Finance Lab of the Ludovika University of Public Service. Thank you for the university’s support.The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan does not bear responsibility for the content of the article.

Banks and Bank SystemsVol. 21(4)
Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU), Ludovika University of Public Service (HU), University of Szeged (HU), Central Bank of Uzbekistan (UZ), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon