Impact of the anchor borrowers’ programme on rice production among smallholder farmers in Garun Mallam Local Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria (2015–2023)

This study examined the impact of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme (ABP) on rice production among smallholder farmers in Garun Mallam Local Government Area (LGA), Kano State, Nigeria, from 2015 to 2023. The study specifically assessed the programme’s influence on rice output, its contribution to increased rice production, differences in production between beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries, changes in cultivated land size, and perceived changes in rice output following the programme’s implementation. A mixed-methods research design was adopted, combining quantitative and qualitative data. The study population comprised 4,244 ABP beneficiary farmers, as well as relevant stakeholders from government agencies, the Rice Farmers Association of Nigeria (RIFAN), and the Bank of Agriculture. A sample of 353 farmers was selected using Krejcie and Morgan’s sampling approach, while 15 key stakeholders were purposively selected for interviews. Of the 353 questionnaires administered, 345 were returned and analyzed, representing a response rate of approximately 97.7%. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to analyze the quantitative data, while interview responses provided supplementary qualitative insights. The findings revealed that 87.1% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the ABP positively influenced rice production, while 91.8% agreed or strongly agreed that the programme increased total rice output. Furthermore, 72.2% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that programme beneficiaries experienced higher rice production than non-beneficiaries. Regarding cultivated land, 93.0% agreed or strongly agreed that the programme contributed to an increase in the size of farmland used for rice cultivation. In addition, 87.2% of respondents reported high or very high changes in rice production following the programme’s implementation. Interview findings also suggested that access to agricultural inputs, financial support, and opportunities for dry-season farming contributed to increased rice production. However, challenges such as delays in the delivery of inputs, inadequate input quality, loan approval delays, and excessive administrative charges were identified. The study concludes that the ABP was perceived by most respondents to have contributed to increased rice production and expanded cultivated land in the study area. It recommends timely disbursement of agricultural credit, improved quality control and distribution of farm inputs, and stronger monitoring of programme implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aminu Kano Academic Scholars Association Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64726/4yz5fk16
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Impact of the anchor borrowers’ programme on rice production among smallholder farmers in Garun Mallam Local Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria (2015–2023)

HASSAN ZAKARI KANO, AHMAD JIBRIL GARBA, Lablatu Mukhtar kurawa, Ummasalma Y. Shuaibu et al.
1 links
Aminu Kano Academic Scholars Association Multidisciplinary Journal
Agricultural Economics and Practices
article

Impact of the anchor borrowers’ programme on rice production among smallholder farmers in Garun Mallam Local Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria (2015–2023)

HASSAN ZAKARI KANO, AHMAD JIBRIL GARBA, Lablatu Mukhtar kurawa, Ummasalma Y. Shuaibu, Sulaiman H. Audu, Zurah A. Yargaya, S. Salisu
article en

Abstract

This study examined the impact of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme (ABP) on rice production among smallholder farmers in Garun Mallam Local Government Area (LGA), Kano State, Nigeria, from 2015 to 2023. The study specifically assessed the programme’s influence on rice output, its contribution to increased rice production, differences in production between beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries, changes in cultivated land size, and perceived changes in rice output following the programme’s implementation. A mixed-methods research design was adopted, combining quantitative and qualitative data. The study population comprised 4,244 ABP beneficiary farmers, as well as relevant stakeholders from government agencies, the Rice Farmers Association of Nigeria (RIFAN), and the Bank of Agriculture. A sample of 353 farmers was selected using Krejcie and Morgan’s sampling approach, while 15 key stakeholders were purposively selected for interviews. Of the 353 questionnaires administered, 345 were returned and analyzed, representing a response rate of approximately 97.7%. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to analyze the quantitative data, while interview responses provided supplementary qualitative insights. The findings revealed that 87.1% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the ABP positively influenced rice production, while 91.8% agreed or strongly agreed that the programme increased total rice output. Furthermore, 72.2% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that programme beneficiaries experienced higher rice production than non-beneficiaries. Regarding cultivated land, 93.0% agreed or strongly agreed that the programme contributed to an increase in the size of farmland used for rice cultivation. In addition, 87.2% of respondents reported high or very high changes in rice production following the programme’s implementation. Interview findings also suggested that access to agricultural inputs, financial support, and opportunities for dry-season farming contributed to increased rice production. However, challenges such as delays in the delivery of inputs, inadequate input quality, loan approval delays, and excessive administrative charges were identified. The study concludes that the ABP was perceived by most respondents to have contributed to increased rice production and expanded cultivated land in the study area. It recommends timely disbursement of agricultural credit, improved quality control and distribution of farm inputs, and stronger monitoring of programme implementation.

Aminu Kano Academic Scholars Association Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 6(3)
Zero hunger, No poverty, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon