Taking the Piss Out of Little Hans: A Metabolic Reading for the Anthropocene

When writing about what he called the nonhuman environment over sixty years ago, Harold Searles decried how psychoanalysis had “skeletally limit[ed] itself to a portrayal of human beings alone […].” A fateful, even fatal, limitation, this schism between the human and what I describe as the more-than-human lies at the heart of psychoanalysis and our era of the Anthropocene. My essay addresses this illusory if powerful split by returning to one of Sigmund Freud’s foundational cases, the “Analysis of a Phobia of a Five-Year-Old Boy” (1909) or Little Hans. In it, I work with metabolism, waste and excrement as material and psychic realities as well as metonyms for our permeability with the more-than-human, asking how we endlessly incorporate, circulate, transform and excrete a world of infinite, mutual embeddedness. Using metabolism to think allows us to re-contextualize psychoanalysis and Freud’s key case about Little Hans in terms of the more-than-human and our fears about it. Reading Freud with and against himself, I show how our fundamental permeability with the more-than-human has always already been hiding in plain, precarious, unconscious sight. I argue that attending to this reality can help us make better use of psychoanalysis and its potential as we collectively teeter off the edge of planetary destruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychoanalytic Inquiry
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2026.2753999
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Taking the Piss Out of Little Hans: A Metabolic Reading for the Anthropocene

Susan Kassouf
3 citations
Psychoanalytic Inquiry
Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
31.63
article

Taking the Piss Out of Little Hans: A Metabolic Reading for the Anthropocene

Susan Kassouf
article en
3 citations

Abstract

When writing about what he called the nonhuman environment over sixty years ago, Harold Searles decried how psychoanalysis had “skeletally limit[ed] itself to a portrayal of human beings alone […].” A fateful, even fatal, limitation, this schism between the human and what I describe as the more-than-human lies at the heart of psychoanalysis and our era of the Anthropocene. My essay addresses this illusory if powerful split by returning to one of Sigmund Freud’s foundational cases, the “Analysis of a Phobia of a Five-Year-Old Boy” (1909) or Little Hans. In it, I work with metabolism, waste and excrement as material and psychic realities as well as metonyms for our permeability with the more-than-human, asking how we endlessly incorporate, circulate, transform and excrete a world of infinite, mutual embeddedness. Using metabolism to think allows us to re-contextualize psychoanalysis and Freud’s key case about Little Hans in terms of the more-than-human and our fears about it. Reading Freud with and against himself, I show how our fundamental permeability with the more-than-human has always already been hiding in plain, precarious, unconscious sight. I argue that attending to this reality can help us make better use of psychoanalysis and its potential as we collectively teeter off the edge of planetary destruction.

Psychoanalytic Inquiry
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
31.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon