Not passive sponges: When attention wanes, our brains are less synchronized with the environment

Without even being aware, humans are amazingly sensitive to the structures around them. Is this sensitivity constant or does it fluctuate along with our attentional states? To answer this foundational question, we deployed temporally sensitive measures that allow us to track neural entrainment—the synchronization of brain activity to environmental regularities—alongside fluctuations in attentional states. Participants (n = 78) viewed both random and structured visual streams while performing a task to index fluctuating attentional states. Structured streams evoked robust neural entrainment and reduced attentional lapses. Moreover, attentional states varied with neural entrainment. Across participants, those who displayed greater neural entrainment had reduced attentional lapses. And critically, even within individuals, greater entrainment was observed during periods of greater attentional focus. Our sensitivity to structure and attentional states are therefore inextricably linked: structures stabilize our attentional states and our sensitivity to structure dynamically mirrors the ebb and flow of human attention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jnsa9
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Not passive sponges: When attention wanes, our brains are less synchronized with the environment

Amy S. Finn, Laura J. Batterink, Davide Crepaldi, Elena Greatti
1 links
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Neural dynamics and brain function
preprint

Not passive sponges: When attention wanes, our brains are less synchronized with the environment

Amy S. Finn, Laura J. Batterink, Davide Crepaldi, Elena Greatti
preprint en

Abstract

Without even being aware, humans are amazingly sensitive to the structures around them. Is this sensitivity constant or does it fluctuate along with our attentional states? To answer this foundational question, we deployed temporally sensitive measures that allow us to track neural entrainment—the synchronization of brain activity to environmental regularities—alongside fluctuations in attentional states. Participants (n = 78) viewed both random and structured visual streams while performing a task to index fluctuating attentional states. Structured streams evoked robust neural entrainment and reduced attentional lapses. Moreover, attentional states varied with neural entrainment. Across participants, those who displayed greater neural entrainment had reduced attentional lapses. And critically, even within individuals, greater entrainment was observed during periods of greater attentional focus. Our sensitivity to structure and attentional states are therefore inextricably linked: structures stabilize our attentional states and our sensitivity to structure dynamically mirrors the ebb and flow of human attention.

PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Neural dynamics and brain function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon