M300-C18150 bimetal 3D printing by laser powder bed fusion: effect of process parameters on single track and layer development

Abstract Powder Bed Fusion of metals using laser beam (PBF-LB/M) relies on stable single-track and single-layer deposition to produce dense, and defect-free components, a requirement that is particularly challenging in bimetallic systems with dissimilar thermophysical properties. This study investigated the effects of PBF-LB/M process parameters on single-track and single-layer deposition in a bimetallic system comprising M300 maraging steel and C18150 copper alloy. An SLM 280 2.0 2MA PBF-LB/M machine equipped with twin 700 W IPG Ytterbium fiber lasers was used to print the bimetal samples. Laser scan velocities (500–1100 mm/s), laser powers (300–550 W), and hatch spacings (0.08–0.14 mm) were systematically varied for deposition of M300 on C18150 substrates and vice versa. Surface integrity was quantified using surface roughness parameters (Ra and Sa), while melt pool geometry and interfacial characteristics were analysed using optical and scanning electron microscopy. For single tracks of M300 deposited on C18150, increasing scan velocity led to higher surface roughness and reduced melt pool width and depth, whereas higher laser power increased melt pool dimensions. In contrast, single tracks of C18150 deposited on M300 exhibited discontinuous tracks, high variability in melt pool geometry, and unstable deposition behaviour. Single-layer results revealed smoother surfaces for M300 on C18150 under low scan velocity, 500–700 mm/s, small hatch spacing, 0.08–0.1 mm and high laser power, 400–450 W. The reverse configuration, C18150 on M300, however, rendered better surface quality at the same velocity and hatch space ranges but at higher power, 500–550 W. The lowest surface roughness (Ra = 15.7 ± 1.9 μm; Sa = 19.9 ± 0.4 μm ) was for M300 on C18150 configuration and for C18150 on M300 (Ra = 14.9 ± 7.1 μm; Sa = 48 ± 16 μm). Interfacial analysis showed material intermixing in both configurations, with more pronounced defect formation when depositing C18150 on M300. Overall, the results of this study provide critical insights into the process–structure relationships governing bimetallic PBF-LB/M fabrication and contribute to the advancement of parameter optimisation strategies for the production of structurally sound bimetallic components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-026-02040-9
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

M300-C18150 bimetal 3D printing by laser powder bed fusion: effect of process parameters on single track and layer development

Daniel East, Geoff Robert de Looze, Reza Ghomashchi, Shahrooz Nafisi et al.
3 links
Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

M300-C18150 bimetal 3D printing by laser powder bed fusion: effect of process parameters on single track and layer development

Daniel East, Geoff Robert de Looze, Reza Ghomashchi, Shahrooz Nafisi, David Ritchie, Tahir Abbas, Ling Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Powder Bed Fusion of metals using laser beam (PBF-LB/M) relies on stable single-track and single-layer deposition to produce dense, and defect-free components, a requirement that is particularly challenging in bimetallic systems with dissimilar thermophysical properties. This study investigated the effects of PBF-LB/M process parameters on single-track and single-layer deposition in a bimetallic system comprising M300 maraging steel and C18150 copper alloy. An SLM 280 2.0 2MA PBF-LB/M machine equipped with twin 700 W IPG Ytterbium fiber lasers was used to print the bimetal samples. Laser scan velocities (500–1100 mm/s), laser powers (300–550 W), and hatch spacings (0.08–0.14 mm) were systematically varied for deposition of M300 on C18150 substrates and vice versa. Surface integrity was quantified using surface roughness parameters (Ra and Sa), while melt pool geometry and interfacial characteristics were analysed using optical and scanning electron microscopy. For single tracks of M300 deposited on C18150, increasing scan velocity led to higher surface roughness and reduced melt pool width and depth, whereas higher laser power increased melt pool dimensions. In contrast, single tracks of C18150 deposited on M300 exhibited discontinuous tracks, high variability in melt pool geometry, and unstable deposition behaviour. Single-layer results revealed smoother surfaces for M300 on C18150 under low scan velocity, 500–700 mm/s, small hatch spacing, 0.08–0.1 mm and high laser power, 400–450 W. The reverse configuration, C18150 on M300, however, rendered better surface quality at the same velocity and hatch space ranges but at higher power, 500–550 W. The lowest surface roughness (Ra = 15.7 ± 1.9 μm; Sa = 19.9 ± 0.4 μm ) was for M300 on C18150 configuration and for C18150 on M300 (Ra = 14.9 ± 7.1 μm; Sa = 48 ± 16 μm). Interfacial analysis showed material intermixing in both configurations, with more pronounced defect formation when depositing C18150 on M300. Overall, the results of this study provide critical insights into the process–structure relationships governing bimetallic PBF-LB/M fabrication and contribute to the advancement of parameter optimisation strategies for the production of structurally sound bimetallic components.

Progress in Additive Manufacturing
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Adelaide University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon