Evaluating Semantic Resources in the age of Generative AI

Ensuring the quality of semantic resources such as ontologies and knowledge graphs remains a central challenge in knowledge engineering, particularly as knowledge-driven systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains. Errors, inconsistencies, and embedded biases in these resources can propagate through downstream applications, leading to significant technical, social, and ethical consequences. Historically, the field has navigated a challenging trade-off between automatic evaluation approaches, which offer high scalability, and human-centric methods, which are necessary for capturing errors that require deep contextual understanding. This keynote explores how the emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) provides a transformative solution to this dilemma by supporting and scaling human-centric evaluations. We will exam the evolving landscape of GenAI supported evaluation methods, with a specific emphasis on the complexity of knowledge these systems are capable of assessing. Furthermore, we will present frameworks for the optimal combination of GenAI and human contributors, highlighting how this synergy can enhance the scalability of semantic quality assurance in next-generation knowledge-driven systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24010228
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluating Semantic Resources in the age of Generative AI

Marta Sabou
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

Evaluating Semantic Resources in the age of Generative AI

Marta Sabou
article en

Abstract

Ensuring the quality of semantic resources such as ontologies and knowledge graphs remains a central challenge in knowledge engineering, particularly as knowledge-driven systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains. Errors, inconsistencies, and embedded biases in these resources can propagate through downstream applications, leading to significant technical, social, and ethical consequences. Historically, the field has navigated a challenging trade-off between automatic evaluation approaches, which offer high scalability, and human-centric methods, which are necessary for capturing errors that require deep contextual understanding. This keynote explores how the emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) provides a transformative solution to this dilemma by supporting and scaling human-centric evaluations. We will exam the evolving landscape of GenAI supported evaluation methods, with a specific emphasis on the complexity of knowledge these systems are capable of assessing. Furthermore, we will present frameworks for the optimal combination of GenAI and human contributors, highlighting how this synergy can enhance the scalability of semantic quality assurance in next-generation knowledge-driven systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon