Assessment of the effectiveness of the BOPPPS-CBL model in medical English teaching for Chinese clinical medicine undergraduate students: a quantitative non-randomized controlled study

Medical English is a core competency for clinical medical professionals. Traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) overemphasizes passive memorization and neglects practical language application, leading to low learning engagement and insufficient comprehensive language competence. The BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching model has yielded encouraging results in previous professional medical education research. Nevertheless, its potential applicability and comparative advantages in medical English teaching for Chinese clinical undergraduates remain insufficiently validated and require further empirical exploration. A non-randomized controlled quantitative study was conducted at Guilin Medical University from March to December 2025. A total of 137 fourth-semester clinical medicine undergraduates were assigned to an experimental group ( n = 68, receiving BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching) and a control group ( n = 69, receiving traditional LBL teaching). Outcomes were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and a 100-point final examination covering listening comprehension, medical term interpretation, reading comprehension, writing, and translation. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-test and chi-square test in SPSS 26.0. Baseline demographic characteristics and basic English proficiency were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The experimental group achieved significantly higher scores in learning motivation, problem-solving skills, teamwork, teaching perception, targeted feedback, and overall course satisfaction (all P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The mean final examination score was significantly higher in the experimental group (87.74 ± 6.02 vs. 83.84 ± 7.29, P < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.58), particularly in medical term interpretation, reading comprehension, and translation (all P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in listening comprehension, writing, or general course cognition between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In this non-randomized study context, students receiving the BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching model exhibited relatively better outcomes regarding comprehensive medical-English competence, self-reported learning attitudes, and academic performance when compared with peers taught via traditional LBL. Observed group differences suggest associations with the BOPPPS-CBL instructional package rather than definitive causal effects. This intervention provides a feasible reference for medical English teaching reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1898727
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Assessment of the effectiveness of the BOPPPS-CBL model in medical English teaching for Chinese clinical medicine undergraduate students: a quantitative non-randomized controlled study

Junhai Zhou, 梁雪清, Dan Wang, Wenqi Liao et al.
2 links
Frontiers in Medicine
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Assessment of the effectiveness of the BOPPPS-CBL model in medical English teaching for Chinese clinical medicine undergraduate students: a quantitative non-randomized controlled study

Junhai Zhou, 梁雪清, Dan Wang, Wenqi Liao, Qian Li
article en

Abstract

Medical English is a core competency for clinical medical professionals. Traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) overemphasizes passive memorization and neglects practical language application, leading to low learning engagement and insufficient comprehensive language competence. The BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching model has yielded encouraging results in previous professional medical education research. Nevertheless, its potential applicability and comparative advantages in medical English teaching for Chinese clinical undergraduates remain insufficiently validated and require further empirical exploration. A non-randomized controlled quantitative study was conducted at Guilin Medical University from March to December 2025. A total of 137 fourth-semester clinical medicine undergraduates were assigned to an experimental group ( n = 68, receiving BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching) and a control group ( n = 69, receiving traditional LBL teaching). Outcomes were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and a 100-point final examination covering listening comprehension, medical term interpretation, reading comprehension, writing, and translation. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-test and chi-square test in SPSS 26.0. Baseline demographic characteristics and basic English proficiency were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The experimental group achieved significantly higher scores in learning motivation, problem-solving skills, teamwork, teaching perception, targeted feedback, and overall course satisfaction (all P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The mean final examination score was significantly higher in the experimental group (87.74 ± 6.02 vs. 83.84 ± 7.29, P < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.58), particularly in medical term interpretation, reading comprehension, and translation (all P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in listening comprehension, writing, or general course cognition between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In this non-randomized study context, students receiving the BOPPPS-CBL blended teaching model exhibited relatively better outcomes regarding comprehensive medical-English competence, self-reported learning attitudes, and academic performance when compared with peers taught via traditional LBL. Observed group differences suggest associations with the BOPPPS-CBL instructional package rather than definitive causal effects. This intervention provides a feasible reference for medical English teaching reform.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Guilin Medical University (CN)
Quality education, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon