The Remembering Hand: Culinary Memory, Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Knowing

A recipe is not the same thing as the knowledge needed to cook it. Written recipes preserveingredients, quantities and sequences, yet cooks also judge readiness through touch, sound,smell and long practice, and they learn this judgement from other people. This paper develops aconceptual framework for studying how culinary knowledge is carried without being writtendown, and for asking what may be lost when it is converted into digital data and AI-generatedtext. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience, the anthropology of skill and food, and scholarship onBengal and Bangladesh, it distinguishes four dimensions of culinary knowledge: recorded,embodied, sensory and social. It argues that memory is reconstructive and selective rather thana store of exact records, that forgetting can be adaptive, and that these features sit comfortablywith practices in which cooks reproduce a dish from judgement rather than from exactmeasurements. It then considers current limits of food-related AI, while rejecting the claim thatAI can never represent sensory information. The paper concludes with a proposed fieldworkdesign centred on a single Bangladeshi dish, intended to test the framework withconsent-based, community-controlled methods.Keywords: culinary memory; tacit knowledge; embodied skill; Bangladeshi cuisine; artificialintelligence; oral transmission; food heritage

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.11925.08163
Primary Topic
Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Remembering Hand: Culinary Memory, Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Knowing

ARFATUL ISLAM
2 links
Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
article

The Remembering Hand: Culinary Memory, Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Knowing

ARFATUL ISLAM
article en

Abstract

A recipe is not the same thing as the knowledge needed to cook it. Written recipes preserveingredients, quantities and sequences, yet cooks also judge readiness through touch, sound,smell and long practice, and they learn this judgement from other people. This paper develops aconceptual framework for studying how culinary knowledge is carried without being writtendown, and for asking what may be lost when it is converted into digital data and AI-generatedtext. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience, the anthropology of skill and food, and scholarship onBengal and Bangladesh, it distinguishes four dimensions of culinary knowledge: recorded,embodied, sensory and social. It argues that memory is reconstructive and selective rather thana store of exact records, that forgetting can be adaptive, and that these features sit comfortablywith practices in which cooks reproduce a dish from judgement rather than from exactmeasurements. It then considers current limits of food-related AI, while rejecting the claim thatAI can never represent sensory information. The paper concludes with a proposed fieldworkdesign centred on a single Bangladeshi dish, intended to test the framework withconsent-based, community-controlled methods.Keywords: culinary memory; tacit knowledge; embodied skill; Bangladeshi cuisine; artificialintelligence; oral transmission; food heritage

Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon