Sterile gel may not be necessary for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using 21-gauge or finer needles: Results of a 30-month retrospective audit of 1,060 patients

Background: The UK Good Infection Prevention Practice (GIPP), mandates the use of sterile ultrasound gel for medical procedures penetrating the skin. Over 25 years, our practice has not used sterile ultrasound gel for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) with 21G or finer needles. This audit aimed to identify post-procedure infections that may have occurred due to the use of non-sterile gel during UGFS.Methods: We reviewed clinical records of all patients undergoing UGFS between January 2024 and July 2026, looking for any post-procedure infections or antibiotic prescriptions. We recorded patient demographics, dates and number of UGFS sessions, diagnosed infections and reasons for any antibiotic prescription. Results: We found 1,060 patients (M 24.3%, F 75.7%), mean age 58.9 years (range 20.1 - 92.9). There were 1,555 UGFS sessions, 965 unilateral leg, 550 bilateral legs, 33 vulval, 6 breast and 1 hand. Three patients had antibiotics prescribed post-UGFS. One was prophylactic before extensive post-foam blood release, and a second was for patient concerns that turned out to be superficial thrombophlebitis. Only one could possibly be for infection. However, this presented 9 weeks post-UGFS in a patient with lipodermatosclerosis and pre-procedure lymphoedema, was bilateral despite having each leg treated at different sessions and did not respond to antibiotics. This was more likely to be an acute flare-up of lymphoedema exacerbated by sclerotherapy. Therefore, our proven infection rate is 0%, but if we count this case as an infection, our rate was 0.13% per session. Discussion: The GIPP guidelines’ criteria for using sterile gel were informed by outbreaks and complications in situations very different from our UGFS practice. Performing UGFS with a 21-gauge needle or finer, using detergent sclerosants and cleaning the probe between patients appears to allow the use of non-sterile ultrasound gel, without exposing patients to a significant risk of infection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zqp9r_v1
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Sterile gel may not be necessary for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using 21-gauge or finer needles: Results of a 30-month retrospective audit of 1,060 patients

Mark Steven Whiteley, Liliana M Turnbull, Ray’an A Bhanji, Jophy LY Lee et al.
1 links
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Surgical site infection prevention
preprint

Sterile gel may not be necessary for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using 21-gauge or finer needles: Results of a 30-month retrospective audit of 1,060 patients

Mark Steven Whiteley, Liliana M Turnbull, Ray’an A Bhanji, Jophy LY Lee, Caterina Fissi, Vicky L Davies, Jenna Derry, Eva I Antony
preprint en

Abstract

Background: The UK Good Infection Prevention Practice (GIPP), mandates the use of sterile ultrasound gel for medical procedures penetrating the skin. Over 25 years, our practice has not used sterile ultrasound gel for ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) with 21G or finer needles. This audit aimed to identify post-procedure infections that may have occurred due to the use of non-sterile gel during UGFS.Methods: We reviewed clinical records of all patients undergoing UGFS between January 2024 and July 2026, looking for any post-procedure infections or antibiotic prescriptions. We recorded patient demographics, dates and number of UGFS sessions, diagnosed infections and reasons for any antibiotic prescription. Results: We found 1,060 patients (M 24.3%, F 75.7%), mean age 58.9 years (range 20.1 - 92.9). There were 1,555 UGFS sessions, 965 unilateral leg, 550 bilateral legs, 33 vulval, 6 breast and 1 hand. Three patients had antibiotics prescribed post-UGFS. One was prophylactic before extensive post-foam blood release, and a second was for patient concerns that turned out to be superficial thrombophlebitis. Only one could possibly be for infection. However, this presented 9 weeks post-UGFS in a patient with lipodermatosclerosis and pre-procedure lymphoedema, was bilateral despite having each leg treated at different sessions and did not respond to antibiotics. This was more likely to be an acute flare-up of lymphoedema exacerbated by sclerotherapy. Therefore, our proven infection rate is 0%, but if we count this case as an infection, our rate was 0.13% per session. Discussion: The GIPP guidelines’ criteria for using sterile gel were informed by outbreaks and complications in situations very different from our UGFS practice. Performing UGFS with a 21-gauge needle or finer, using detergent sclerosants and cleaning the probe between patients appears to allow the use of non-sterile ultrasound gel, without exposing patients to a significant risk of infection.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Good health and well-being
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon