Adaptive error management for fault-tolerant quantum computing across hardware-level suppression, system-level diagnosis, and real-time decoding

Abstract Fault-tolerant quantum computing reached a milestone in December 2024 when Google’s Willow processor demonstrated below-threshold error correction on a superconducting chip, a result since reproduced on neutral-atom and alternative superconducting platforms. Yet the classical decoders needed to sustain this performance face a scaling challenge: noise becomes increasingly structured and correlated as systems grow, while decoders must respond within microsecond coherence windows. This survey asks whether error suppression, noise diagnosis, and decoding are better treated as one adaptive control problem than as three separate research programs. Drawing on a scoping review of 146 records, it organizes the field into a three-layer taxonomy. Layer 1 (Hardware-Level Suppression) integrates protection into the physical substrate; bosonic cat qubits exponentially suppress bit-flip errors, projecting up to 90% overhead reduction versus surface codes. Layer 2 (Diagnosis) employs probabilistic models and computational intelligence to characterize error sources; neuro-fuzzy architectures and the Bias–Entropy decomposition separate hardware drift from logical faults, subject to an identifiability limit that we characterize. Layer 3 (Real-time Decoding) targets the integration of machine learning within strict latency constraints. Hardware acceleration now approaches superconducting cycle times, which shifts the case for learned decoders from speed toward accuracy under correlated noise; recent advances favor hybrid, physics-informed architectures: Neural Belief Propagation resolves degeneracy issues in quantum low-density parity-check codes by embedding topological constraints directly into the network’s loss function. These results suggest a transition toward closed-loop AI architectures that treat error management as continuous control rather than static algorithm selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Quantum Science
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44464-026-00050-8
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Adaptive error management for fault-tolerant quantum computing across hardware-level suppression, system-level diagnosis, and real-time decoding

Naima Kaabouch, Marwa R. Donkol
1 links
Discover Quantum Science
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Adaptive error management for fault-tolerant quantum computing across hardware-level suppression, system-level diagnosis, and real-time decoding

Naima Kaabouch, Marwa R. Donkol
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fault-tolerant quantum computing reached a milestone in December 2024 when Google’s Willow processor demonstrated below-threshold error correction on a superconducting chip, a result since reproduced on neutral-atom and alternative superconducting platforms. Yet the classical decoders needed to sustain this performance face a scaling challenge: noise becomes increasingly structured and correlated as systems grow, while decoders must respond within microsecond coherence windows. This survey asks whether error suppression, noise diagnosis, and decoding are better treated as one adaptive control problem than as three separate research programs. Drawing on a scoping review of 146 records, it organizes the field into a three-layer taxonomy. Layer 1 (Hardware-Level Suppression) integrates protection into the physical substrate; bosonic cat qubits exponentially suppress bit-flip errors, projecting up to 90% overhead reduction versus surface codes. Layer 2 (Diagnosis) employs probabilistic models and computational intelligence to characterize error sources; neuro-fuzzy architectures and the Bias–Entropy decomposition separate hardware drift from logical faults, subject to an identifiability limit that we characterize. Layer 3 (Real-time Decoding) targets the integration of machine learning within strict latency constraints. Hardware acceleration now approaches superconducting cycle times, which shifts the case for learned decoders from speed toward accuracy under correlated noise; recent advances favor hybrid, physics-informed architectures: Neural Belief Propagation resolves degeneracy issues in quantum low-density parity-check codes by embedding topological constraints directly into the network’s loss function. These results suggest a transition toward closed-loop AI architectures that treat error management as continuous control rather than static algorithm selection.

Discover Quantum ScienceVol. 2(1)
University of North Dakota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Adaptive error management for fault-tolerant quantum computing across hardware-level suppression, system-level diagnosis, and real-time decoding — Naima Kaabouch, Marwa R. Donkol · Discover Quantum Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS