Coordinating Heterogeneous Evidence: A Source‐Traceable Protocol for Claim Promotion

ABSTRACT Documentary analysis brings together judgements about source content, claim readiness, downstream use and reportable conclusions. This article presents a source‐traceable procedure that assigns these judgements to distinct analytic objects and connects them through explicit handoffs. Four functional statuses characterize fixed source spans; a condition‐based control records whether a proposed claim is released, qualified, held or withdrawn. Source support and reporting permission remain separately inspectable. Public Horizon records provide a designer‐applied worked demonstration, whereas State v. Loomis provides a sanity check on two established use boundaries. A hypothetical contrast on one Horizon object makes the integration visible: An aggregate statement can remain reportable, whereas an individual‐level promotion is held and a boundary‐crossing inquiry remains unresolved. The article also specifies a prospective independent‐coder study of the functional instrument. Together, the codebook, source manifest and evaluation design provide an operational specification for inspection, reapplication, and subsequent testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.70184
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Coordinating Heterogeneous Evidence: A Source‐Traceable Protocol for Claim Promotion

Ziqi Ge
4 links
Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Coordinating Heterogeneous Evidence: A Source‐Traceable Protocol for Claim Promotion

Ziqi Ge
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Documentary analysis brings together judgements about source content, claim readiness, downstream use and reportable conclusions. This article presents a source‐traceable procedure that assigns these judgements to distinct analytic objects and connects them through explicit handoffs. Four functional statuses characterize fixed source spans; a condition‐based control records whether a proposed claim is released, qualified, held or withdrawn. Source support and reporting permission remain separately inspectable. Public Horizon records provide a designer‐applied worked demonstration, whereas State v. Loomis provides a sanity check on two established use boundaries. A hypothetical contrast on one Horizon object makes the integration visible: An aggregate statement can remain reportable, whereas an individual‐level promotion is held and a boundary‐crossing inquiry remains unresolved. The article also specifies a prospective independent‐coder study of the functional instrument. Together, the codebook, source manifest and evaluation design provide an operational specification for inspection, reapplication, and subsequent testing.

Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon