As an editor, am I worrying about the wrong “black box”?

Generative AI has become part of scholarly publishing, but policies governing its use remain unsettled. Drawing on research, editorial experience, and familiar publishing technologies, this article asks editors to look beyond whether AI was used and consider what actually matters: confidentiality, accuracy, scholarly integrity, human accountability, and sound editorial judgment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Working Guide to Editorial Systems
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67130/wges.2027.025
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

As an editor, am I worrying about the wrong “black box”?

Leslie H. Nicoll
The Working Guide to Editorial Systems
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

As an editor, am I worrying about the wrong “black box”?

Leslie H. Nicoll
article en

Abstract

Generative AI has become part of scholarly publishing, but policies governing its use remain unsettled. Drawing on research, editorial experience, and familiar publishing technologies, this article asks editors to look beyond whether AI was used and consider what actually matters: confidentiality, accuracy, scholarly integrity, human accountability, and sound editorial judgment.

The Working Guide to Editorial Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon