Dynamic Limits of Spur Gear Tip Relief Under Center-Distance Variation: Coexisting Impacts and Dynamical Integrity

Quasi-static tip relief design alone cannot determine the range of relief amounts that satisfies dynamic contact requirements and ensures recovery from finite perturbations. This study determines this range and its controlling mechanisms for spur gears assembled at different center distances. A single-degree-of-freedom model uses a pairwise piecewise-linear mesh force table accounting for extended tooth contact and gear-body coupling. Periodic-solution continuation, boundary tracking and a local integrity measure assess persistent contact, premature mesh-in and recovery. Premature mesh-in near primary or superharmonic resonance sets a dynamic lower bound that differs from the quasi-static limit. In the baseline case, an impacting isola erodes the basin of attraction of the normal periodic solution while it remains stable and in persistent contact. Recovery therefore fails before contact loss, setting the upper bound. For the speed range considered and a dimensionless perturbation radius of 0.10, the admissible range is 7.7–15.7 µm. Increasing the center distance changes the mechanisms and speeds controlling the bounds and narrows the range until it vanishes at a center-distance increase of about 1.56 mm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14111305
Primary Topic
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Dynamic Limits of Spur Gear Tip Relief Under Center-Distance Variation: Coexisting Impacts and Dynamical Integrity

Wencheng Tang, Junjie Xie, Ruxin Lu, Qi Huang
Machines
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
article

Dynamic Limits of Spur Gear Tip Relief Under Center-Distance Variation: Coexisting Impacts and Dynamical Integrity

Wencheng Tang, Junjie Xie, Ruxin Lu, Qi Huang
article en

Abstract

Quasi-static tip relief design alone cannot determine the range of relief amounts that satisfies dynamic contact requirements and ensures recovery from finite perturbations. This study determines this range and its controlling mechanisms for spur gears assembled at different center distances. A single-degree-of-freedom model uses a pairwise piecewise-linear mesh force table accounting for extended tooth contact and gear-body coupling. Periodic-solution continuation, boundary tracking and a local integrity measure assess persistent contact, premature mesh-in and recovery. Premature mesh-in near primary or superharmonic resonance sets a dynamic lower bound that differs from the quasi-static limit. In the baseline case, an impacting isola erodes the basin of attraction of the normal periodic solution while it remains stable and in persistent contact. Recovery therefore fails before contact loss, setting the upper bound. For the speed range considered and a dimensionless perturbation radius of 0.10, the admissible range is 7.7–15.7 µm. Increasing the center distance changes the mechanisms and speeds controlling the bounds and narrows the range until it vanishes at a center-distance increase of about 1.56 mm.

MachinesVol. 14(11)
Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Dynamic Limits of Spur Gear Tip Relief Under Center-Distance Variation: Coexisting Impacts and Dynamical Integrity — Wencheng Tang, Junjie Xie, et al. · Machines (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS