Reauthorism in 2026: Public Authorship in the Age of AI and Geoeconomic Power

Reauthorism in 2026: Public Authorship in the Age of AI and Geoeconomic Power presents Herbert R. Sim’s proposed political-economic philosophy of continuing public authorship. It argues that essential economic arrangements should sustain independently governed knowledge, resources and practical capacity through which affected publics can reconsider their purposes, rules and structures—including during successful operation and after changes of ownership. The paper develops eight principles and two proposed institutional mechanisms. The Reauthorial Dividend would support independent expertise, accessible information, participation, evaluation and transition preparation; it need not take the form of a cash payment or shareholding fund. The Successor Duty would preserve comparable public revision capacity through institutional transformation while allowing informed reconsideration of the duty itself. A connected hypothetical water-system example explores international partnerships, procurement and AI-assisted service administration. A seven-part qualitative Reauthorism Test examines standing, knowledge, independent resources, authority over purposes, transition capacity, rights protection and successor obligations. The discussion situates the proposal alongside institutional change, economic democracy, wage-earner funds and democratic experimentalism. It addresses investment stability, funding burdens, institutional capture and the possibility that existing safeguards or less costly alternatives may be sufficient. Prepared on 5 November 2026, this repository edition develops the author’s corresponding web article. It uses normative conceptual analysis and selected scholarly literature. The applications are hypothetical; no empirical evaluation, universal contribution rate, validated numerical weights or pass marks are presented. Retrospective analytical dates are distinguished from evidence of actual publication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23981608
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Reauthorism in 2026: Public Authorship in the Age of AI and Geoeconomic Power

Herbert R. Sim
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
article

Reauthorism in 2026: Public Authorship in the Age of AI and Geoeconomic Power

Herbert R. Sim
article en

Abstract

Reauthorism in 2026: Public Authorship in the Age of AI and Geoeconomic Power presents Herbert R. Sim’s proposed political-economic philosophy of continuing public authorship. It argues that essential economic arrangements should sustain independently governed knowledge, resources and practical capacity through which affected publics can reconsider their purposes, rules and structures—including during successful operation and after changes of ownership. The paper develops eight principles and two proposed institutional mechanisms. The Reauthorial Dividend would support independent expertise, accessible information, participation, evaluation and transition preparation; it need not take the form of a cash payment or shareholding fund. The Successor Duty would preserve comparable public revision capacity through institutional transformation while allowing informed reconsideration of the duty itself. A connected hypothetical water-system example explores international partnerships, procurement and AI-assisted service administration. A seven-part qualitative Reauthorism Test examines standing, knowledge, independent resources, authority over purposes, transition capacity, rights protection and successor obligations. The discussion situates the proposal alongside institutional change, economic democracy, wage-earner funds and democratic experimentalism. It addresses investment stability, funding burdens, institutional capture and the possibility that existing safeguards or less costly alternatives may be sufficient. Prepared on 5 November 2026, this repository edition develops the author’s corresponding web article. It uses normative conceptual analysis and selected scholarly literature. The applications are hypothetical; no empirical evaluation, universal contribution rate, validated numerical weights or pass marks are presented. Retrospective analytical dates are distinguished from evidence of actual publication.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon