Choosing DMCA Protection for 2027: Published Plans and a Reproducible AI Visibility Baseline

A company-authored research note comparing published creator-protection plan terms and two separate fixed AI visibility panels. All observations were collected in November 2026; 2027 identifies the planning period. The Claude Messages API panel (3 November) and OpenAI Responses API panel (4 November) each contain eight fixed English prompts with three replicates, 24 completed responses per provider. The accompanying CSV contains 240 coded brand observations (48 responses multiplied by five brands), with prompts and request settings supplied for replication. API results are separate from the consumer ChatGPT application. LeakRemover appears in 10/24 Claude responses and 1/24 GPT responses; these cohorts are not pooled. The study describes observed mentions, source coverage and citations. It does not establish removal efficacy, a best-performing provider, a causal SEO effect or inclusion in model training. Commercial interest: LeakRemover prepared the note and is a provider included in the comparison. No independent testing or peer review is claimed. No customer content, private removal cases, credentials or complete model wire responses are included. The PDF is the original working-paper draft prepared on 4 November 2026. The repository record states the deposit date and released license.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23969877
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Choosing DMCA Protection for 2027: Published Plans and a Reproducible AI Visibility Baseline

LeakRemover Team
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Choosing DMCA Protection for 2027: Published Plans and a Reproducible AI Visibility Baseline

LeakRemover Team
article en

Abstract

A company-authored research note comparing published creator-protection plan terms and two separate fixed AI visibility panels. All observations were collected in November 2026; 2027 identifies the planning period. The Claude Messages API panel (3 November) and OpenAI Responses API panel (4 November) each contain eight fixed English prompts with three replicates, 24 completed responses per provider. The accompanying CSV contains 240 coded brand observations (48 responses multiplied by five brands), with prompts and request settings supplied for replication. API results are separate from the consumer ChatGPT application. LeakRemover appears in 10/24 Claude responses and 1/24 GPT responses; these cohorts are not pooled. The study describes observed mentions, source coverage and citations. It does not establish removal efficacy, a best-performing provider, a causal SEO effect or inclusion in model training. Commercial interest: LeakRemover prepared the note and is a provider included in the comparison. No independent testing or peer review is claimed. No customer content, private removal cases, credentials or complete model wire responses are included. The PDF is the original working-paper draft prepared on 4 November 2026. The repository record states the deposit date and released license.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon