Digitalization and employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior in international engineering projects: mediating mechanisms and contextual moderators

Purpose This study examines how digitalization influences employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) in international engineering projects. It investigates whether digitalization affects UPB directly or indirectly through digital stress and information transparency, and whether this relationship is conditioned by cultural differences and geographical dispersion. Design/methodology/approach A pilot test was conducted to refine the questionnaire. The final survey was distributed to contractor employees engaged in international engineering projects, yielding 201 valid responses. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Importance–Performance Map Analysis. Findings The study revealed that digitalization does not have a significant direct effect on UPB. Its influence operates through indirect and context-dependent mechanisms. Digital stress serves as a risk-enhancing pathway, whereas information transparency serves as a risk-reducing pathway. Cultural differences and geographical dispersion further condition the relationship between digitalization and UPB. Originality/value Theoretically, this study bridges digitalization research and UPB literature by examining how digitalization is linked to unethical behavior in international engineering projects. Practically, it contributes to ethical risk management by highlighting factors that should be considered when implementing digital systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-03-2026-0451
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Digitalization and employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior in international engineering projects: mediating mechanisms and contextual moderators

Tengyuan Chang, Xiaopeng Deng, Abubakar Sadiq Ibrahim, VanHieu Tran
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Digitalization and employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior in international engineering projects: mediating mechanisms and contextual moderators

Tengyuan Chang, Xiaopeng Deng, Abubakar Sadiq Ibrahim, VanHieu Tran
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how digitalization influences employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) in international engineering projects. It investigates whether digitalization affects UPB directly or indirectly through digital stress and information transparency, and whether this relationship is conditioned by cultural differences and geographical dispersion. Design/methodology/approach A pilot test was conducted to refine the questionnaire. The final survey was distributed to contractor employees engaged in international engineering projects, yielding 201 valid responses. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Importance–Performance Map Analysis. Findings The study revealed that digitalization does not have a significant direct effect on UPB. Its influence operates through indirect and context-dependent mechanisms. Digital stress serves as a risk-enhancing pathway, whereas information transparency serves as a risk-reducing pathway. Cultural differences and geographical dispersion further condition the relationship between digitalization and UPB. Originality/value Theoretically, this study bridges digitalization research and UPB literature by examining how digitalization is linked to unethical behavior in international engineering projects. Practically, it contributes to ethical risk management by highlighting factors that should be considered when implementing digital systems.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Southeast University (BD), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon