Practical Recommendations for Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients Receiving Bispecific Antibodies for Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Bispecific antibodies are novel immunotherapies approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While these therapies induce deep and durable responses, they are associated with adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, that require specific protocols for monitoring, prevention, and treatment. Due to the potential risk of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, current US labeling recommends inpatient administration during step-up dosing of bispecific antibodies, which typically occurs in academic centers and can often restrict the number of patients that can be treated. The administration of bispecific antibodies in the outpatient and community setting can enhance the patient experience and reduce resource use, which is a barrier to the widespread uptake of these treatments. With bispecific antibodies being evaluated in earlier lines of therapy for MM, the broader use of these agents will underscore the need for more accessible and less resource-intensive options that ensure safe outpatient administration. In this Viewpoint, we aim to provide practical recommendations built from our own real-world perspectives and case examples for institutions seeking to implement remote patient monitoring (RPM) strategies to support the outpatient dosing of bispecific antibodies in patients with MM. We discuss how the use of RPM has the potential to improve adverse event detection and management, improve patient outcomes, and decrease resource use and costs. While specific approaches will vary based on the needs of each treatment center, our experiences suggest that RPM implementation can be safe and feasible for both academic and community practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Cancer
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/95949
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Practical Recommendations for Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients Receiving Bispecific Antibodies for Multiple Myeloma

Cindy Varga, Eric Scott Schaefer
JMIR Cancer
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Practical Recommendations for Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients Receiving Bispecific Antibodies for Multiple Myeloma

Cindy Varga, Eric Scott Schaefer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bispecific antibodies are novel immunotherapies approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While these therapies induce deep and durable responses, they are associated with adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, that require specific protocols for monitoring, prevention, and treatment. Due to the potential risk of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, current US labeling recommends inpatient administration during step-up dosing of bispecific antibodies, which typically occurs in academic centers and can often restrict the number of patients that can be treated. The administration of bispecific antibodies in the outpatient and community setting can enhance the patient experience and reduce resource use, which is a barrier to the widespread uptake of these treatments. With bispecific antibodies being evaluated in earlier lines of therapy for MM, the broader use of these agents will underscore the need for more accessible and less resource-intensive options that ensure safe outpatient administration. In this Viewpoint, we aim to provide practical recommendations built from our own real-world perspectives and case examples for institutions seeking to implement remote patient monitoring (RPM) strategies to support the outpatient dosing of bispecific antibodies in patients with MM. We discuss how the use of RPM has the potential to improve adverse event detection and management, improve patient outcomes, and decrease resource use and costs. While specific approaches will vary based on the needs of each treatment center, our experiences suggest that RPM implementation can be safe and feasible for both academic and community practices.

JMIR CancerVol. 12
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon