Assessing corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii during maximal repeated arm cycling sprints

Abstract This study examined the feasibility of assessing corticospinal and spinal excitability of the biceps brachii during maximal repeated arm cycling sprints. Twelve recreationally active participants (10 male, 2 female) completed five maximal arm cycling sprints (17–22s) against a torque factor of 5% body weight, separated by 90s of rest. Corticospinal, spinal and peripheral excitability were assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES), Erb’s point stimulation, respectively. Stimuli were delivered during arm cycling at the 3 o’clock crank position (start of elbow flexion) at an intensity of 130% of active motor threshold (AMT) (determined during submaximal cycling). Mean power and total work both declined by 36.8% from sprints 1–5 ( p < 0.001). Motor evoked potential (MEP), cervicomedullary evoked potential (CMEP), and compound muscle action potential (M max ) amplitudes did not change during the sprint protocol ( p > 0.05). However, following the sprint protocol, the TMES intensity required to evoke CMEPs was reduced by 4.57% compared to pre-sprint values ( p = 0.01), and M max amplitude increased ( p = 0.01) from pre- to post-sprinting by 12.1%. Despite substantial declines in performance, corticospinal and spinal excitability assessed via evoked response amplitudes remained unchanged during maximal sprinting, likely reflecting saturation of the motoneuron pool during high voluntary drive. In contrast, the post-sprint reduction in CMEP threshold and increase in M max indicate enhanced spinal excitability following repeated arm cycling sprints. These findings demonstrate both the feasibility and limitations of assessing corticospinal excitability during sprint exercise and highlight the importance of stimulation intensity selection when probing neural adaptations during high-intensity, dynamic tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11354096/v1
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Assessing corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii during maximal repeated arm cycling sprints

Shahab Alizadeh, Hamid Amoozi, Garreth Kippenhuck, Duane C. Button et al.
Research Square
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
preprint

Assessing corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii during maximal repeated arm cycling sprints

Shahab Alizadeh, Hamid Amoozi, Garreth Kippenhuck, Duane C. Button, Evan J. Lockyer, Kevin E. Power
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract This study examined the feasibility of assessing corticospinal and spinal excitability of the biceps brachii during maximal repeated arm cycling sprints. Twelve recreationally active participants (10 male, 2 female) completed five maximal arm cycling sprints (17–22s) against a torque factor of 5% body weight, separated by 90s of rest. Corticospinal, spinal and peripheral excitability were assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES), Erb’s point stimulation, respectively. Stimuli were delivered during arm cycling at the 3 o’clock crank position (start of elbow flexion) at an intensity of 130% of active motor threshold (AMT) (determined during submaximal cycling). Mean power and total work both declined by 36.8% from sprints 1–5 ( p < 0.001). Motor evoked potential (MEP), cervicomedullary evoked potential (CMEP), and compound muscle action potential (M max ) amplitudes did not change during the sprint protocol ( p > 0.05). However, following the sprint protocol, the TMES intensity required to evoke CMEPs was reduced by 4.57% compared to pre-sprint values ( p = 0.01), and M max amplitude increased ( p = 0.01) from pre- to post-sprinting by 12.1%. Despite substantial declines in performance, corticospinal and spinal excitability assessed via evoked response amplitudes remained unchanged during maximal sprinting, likely reflecting saturation of the motoneuron pool during high voluntary drive. In contrast, the post-sprint reduction in CMEP threshold and increase in M max indicate enhanced spinal excitability following repeated arm cycling sprints. These findings demonstrate both the feasibility and limitations of assessing corticospinal excitability during sprint exercise and highlight the importance of stimulation intensity selection when probing neural adaptations during high-intensity, dynamic tasks.

Research Square
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), University of Calgary (CA)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon