Executive Representation

ABSTRACT There is an enormous theoretical literature on representation through parliamentary means, and a growing literature representation through extra‐parliamentary pathways. However, there is little philosophical literature on representation through the executive. This paper introduces two forms of executive representation—executive leadership and process executive—arguing that these form two different aspects of executive representation. Current theoretical literature discusses leadership executive in terms of symbolic representation but outside of public administration philosophers have ignored process representation. This is a major lacunae since the bulk of citizen interaction with the state are through the courts, police, welfare officers, tax officers, planning departments, teachers, and so on. Briefly reviewing the empirical literature, we argue that process executive representation requires a culture of empathetic leadership and deliberation, alongside descriptive representation. These ideas fit well with political theorists discussion of assembly representation arguing that these ideas need application to the executive as well as the legislature. We also briefly examine how new public management, digitalization, and AI threaten process executive representation. Our paper brings ideas and evidence to the attention of political theorists to inspire further work on executive representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constellations
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.70093
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Executive Representation

Keith M. Dowding, Adriano Giuliani
Constellations
Political Theory and Democracy
article

Executive Representation

Keith M. Dowding, Adriano Giuliani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is an enormous theoretical literature on representation through parliamentary means, and a growing literature representation through extra‐parliamentary pathways. However, there is little philosophical literature on representation through the executive. This paper introduces two forms of executive representation—executive leadership and process executive—arguing that these form two different aspects of executive representation. Current theoretical literature discusses leadership executive in terms of symbolic representation but outside of public administration philosophers have ignored process representation. This is a major lacunae since the bulk of citizen interaction with the state are through the courts, police, welfare officers, tax officers, planning departments, teachers, and so on. Briefly reviewing the empirical literature, we argue that process executive representation requires a culture of empathetic leadership and deliberation, alongside descriptive representation. These ideas fit well with political theorists discussion of assembly representation arguing that these ideas need application to the executive as well as the legislature. We also briefly examine how new public management, digitalization, and AI threaten process executive representation. Our paper brings ideas and evidence to the attention of political theorists to inspire further work on executive representation.

Constellations
Australian National University (AU), Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon