Advances in Immunohistochemistry for Mohs Surgery: A Comprehensive Review for Precision Control and Personalized Surgical Approach

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an increasingly valuable adjunct in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), particularly in the assessment of complex, recurrent, or histologically ambiguous cutaneous tumors. While routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining remains the foundation of intraoperative margin evaluation, IHC techniques can enhance diagnostic accuracy in cases complicated by dense fibrosis, prior surgical alteration, or infiltrative tumor growth patterns. This in-depth review provides a comprehensive overview of the current applications of IHC in MMS, with a focus on commonly utilized markers and their clinical utility across a range of cutaneous malignancies. A structured review of the literature was conducted to identify relevant studies evaluating IHC in the context of MMS and dermatopathology. Several IHC markers demonstrate consistent and accepted utility in Mohs practice, particularly when frozen-section H&E assessment is limited by subtle tumor morphology, inflammation, fibrosis, or ambiguous cellular lineage. Areas of consensus, as well as ongoing controversies related to marker specificity, interpretation variability, cost, and workflow integration, are discussed. Attention is given to the distinction between IHC markers suitable for same-day frozen-section use in outpatient MMS and those better suited for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections or delayed diagnostic confirmation. Limitations of IHC, including potential diagnostic pitfalls and lack of standardized protocols, are highlighted. Finally, emerging markers, advances in digital pathology, and future research directions are explored, emphasizing the evolving role of IHC in optimizing surgical margin assessment and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754261484185
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Advances in Immunohistochemistry for Mohs Surgery: A Comprehensive Review for Precision Control and Personalized Surgical Approach

Émilie Pichette, Elena Netchiporouk, Ghassan M Barnawi, Ivan V. Litvinov et al.
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Advances in Immunohistochemistry for Mohs Surgery: A Comprehensive Review for Precision Control and Personalized Surgical Approach

Émilie Pichette, Elena Netchiporouk, Ghassan M Barnawi, Ivan V. Litvinov, Mariusz Sapijaszko, Özge Kizilay Mancini, Ilya Shoimer, Mária Mádi, May Chergui, Roy Khalaf, Jaggi Rao, Elen Grigorchuk, Juliette Charbonneau, William Chow, Malak Mey Nefti
article en

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an increasingly valuable adjunct in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), particularly in the assessment of complex, recurrent, or histologically ambiguous cutaneous tumors. While routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining remains the foundation of intraoperative margin evaluation, IHC techniques can enhance diagnostic accuracy in cases complicated by dense fibrosis, prior surgical alteration, or infiltrative tumor growth patterns. This in-depth review provides a comprehensive overview of the current applications of IHC in MMS, with a focus on commonly utilized markers and their clinical utility across a range of cutaneous malignancies. A structured review of the literature was conducted to identify relevant studies evaluating IHC in the context of MMS and dermatopathology. Several IHC markers demonstrate consistent and accepted utility in Mohs practice, particularly when frozen-section H&E assessment is limited by subtle tumor morphology, inflammation, fibrosis, or ambiguous cellular lineage. Areas of consensus, as well as ongoing controversies related to marker specificity, interpretation variability, cost, and workflow integration, are discussed. Attention is given to the distinction between IHC markers suitable for same-day frozen-section use in outpatient MMS and those better suited for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections or delayed diagnostic confirmation. Limitations of IHC, including potential diagnostic pitfalls and lack of standardized protocols, are highlighted. Finally, emerging markers, advances in digital pathology, and future research directions are explored, emphasizing the evolving role of IHC in optimizing surgical margin assessment and improving patient outcomes.

Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon