The Unifier: One Axiom from Which Erasure, Triple, Bridge, and CPTP Follow

This paper unifies Tseglin 2026a/b/c/d. In 2026a, we proved no unital map T → E. In 2026b, we generalized to the triple H^n(T(H)) = (dim H^n, dim C^n, 1) for all H, all n. In 2026c, we defined the Bridge Conjecture. In 2026d, we proved the eraser, if physical, must be a CPTP decoherence map. Here we prove: all four follow from one axiom. We call it the Unifier Axiom: quantum does not commute, and erasing quantum is not an algebra map. Formally: [x,y] = 1 in T(H), and there is no unital φ: T(H) → E preserving [x,y]. We prove 2026a is the case H = S^1, 2026b is the case all H, all n, 2026c is the conditional bridge from this axiom to M, and 2026d is the physical form of the eraser forced by this axiom. This paper does not add a new experiment. It adds the roof. If you accept the Unifier, you accept a/b/c/d. If you reject the Unifier, you must say which part fails. Tseglin 2026e = Ch. 140. Cites Tseglin 2026a DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23977165, 2026b DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23980498, 2026c DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23980738, 2026d DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23981860.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23982062
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Unifier: One Axiom from Which Erasure, Triple, Bridge, and CPTP Follow

Robert Aaron Tseglin
8 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

The Unifier: One Axiom from Which Erasure, Triple, Bridge, and CPTP Follow

Robert Aaron Tseglin
article en

Abstract

This paper unifies Tseglin 2026a/b/c/d. In 2026a, we proved no unital map T → E. In 2026b, we generalized to the triple H^n(T(H)) = (dim H^n, dim C^n, 1) for all H, all n. In 2026c, we defined the Bridge Conjecture. In 2026d, we proved the eraser, if physical, must be a CPTP decoherence map. Here we prove: all four follow from one axiom. We call it the Unifier Axiom: quantum does not commute, and erasing quantum is not an algebra map. Formally: [x,y] = 1 in T(H), and there is no unital φ: T(H) → E preserving [x,y]. We prove 2026a is the case H = S^1, 2026b is the case all H, all n, 2026c is the conditional bridge from this axiom to M, and 2026d is the physical form of the eraser forced by this axiom. This paper does not add a new experiment. It adds the roof. If you accept the Unifier, you accept a/b/c/d. If you reject the Unifier, you must say which part fails. Tseglin 2026e = Ch. 140. Cites Tseglin 2026a DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23977165, 2026b DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23980498, 2026c DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23980738, 2026d DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23981860.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon