A framework for evaluating transparency in AI projects

Transparency has become a key requirement of any artificial intelligence (AI) project because it provides a basis for accountability, reliability, and compliance with regulations. Nonetheless, the current approach views transparency as a principle but does not offer ways to evaluate it. The current paper proposes an evaluation framework of transparency in AI projects based on four types of transparency including data, algorithmic, process, and outcome transparency. The proposed framework is based on external drivers and internal enablers of transparency found in the literature and differentiates between transparency indicators and transparency metrics, where the former is a description of the evidence of transparency while the latter is a quantification of such evidence. The requirements of transparency depend on a particular stage of the AI project including data collection and pre-processing, modeling, evaluation, and deployment. The framework has been validated using a case study and an expert assessment. It has been found to evaluate the level of transparency in AI projects adequately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Operations and Analytics
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/29966892.2026.2760117
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A framework for evaluating transparency in AI projects

Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, Sudhaman Parthasarathy
Applied Operations and Analytics
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

A framework for evaluating transparency in AI projects

Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, Sudhaman Parthasarathy
article en

Abstract

Transparency has become a key requirement of any artificial intelligence (AI) project because it provides a basis for accountability, reliability, and compliance with regulations. Nonetheless, the current approach views transparency as a principle but does not offer ways to evaluate it. The current paper proposes an evaluation framework of transparency in AI projects based on four types of transparency including data, algorithmic, process, and outcome transparency. The proposed framework is based on external drivers and internal enablers of transparency found in the literature and differentiates between transparency indicators and transparency metrics, where the former is a description of the evidence of transparency while the latter is a quantification of such evidence. The requirements of transparency depend on a particular stage of the AI project including data collection and pre-processing, modeling, evaluation, and deployment. The framework has been validated using a case study and an expert assessment. It has been found to evaluate the level of transparency in AI projects adequately.

Applied Operations and AnalyticsVol. 2(1)
Thiagarajar College of Engineering (IN), Indian Institute of Management Indore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A framework for evaluating transparency in AI projects — Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, Sudhaman Parthasarathy · Applied Operations and Analytics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS