Leeching the CURE: How a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Influences Students’ Attitudes Toward Scientists, Science Research, and Leeches

Undergraduate research experiences promote critical thinking and improve communication skills; however, they are often not easily accessible, potentially reinforcing existing inequities. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) offer a promising alternative by engaging all students in authentic research experiences that encourage scientific thinking, challenge assumptions, and broaden perspectives. We developed and implemented a microbiology CURE for undergraduate biology majors (n = 154) focused on investigating the gut microbiome of leeches. We examined the impact of this experience on students’ perceptions of scientists, scientific research, and leeches. Before the course, students commonly relied on stereotypical descriptions of scientists (i.e., smart, intelligent) and scientific work (e.g., laboratory science). Following participation in the course, we observed a decrease in stereotypical descriptions of scientists, scientific work, and scientist attire, accompanied by an increase in students considering pursuing research in the future. Similarly, students’ descriptions of leeches transitioned from predominantly negative perceptions (e.g., “blood-sucking creatures”) toward recognition of their species diversity and ecological importance. These findings align with previous reports that CUREs broaden students’ perceptions of science and scientists, suggesting that such experiences may support sustained engagement in science and foster scientific literacy across undergraduate populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The journal of college science teaching
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231x.2026.2742516
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Leeching the CURE: How a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Influences Students’ Attitudes Toward Scientists, Science Research, and Leeches

Carrie Jo Bucklin, Tyler Harper-Gampp, Z. Subvillaga Benitez, R. Gold et al.
The journal of college science teaching
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Leeching the CURE: How a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Influences Students’ Attitudes Toward Scientists, Science Research, and Leeches

Carrie Jo Bucklin, Tyler Harper-Gampp, Z. Subvillaga Benitez, R. Gold, L. Forshee
article en

Abstract

Undergraduate research experiences promote critical thinking and improve communication skills; however, they are often not easily accessible, potentially reinforcing existing inequities. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) offer a promising alternative by engaging all students in authentic research experiences that encourage scientific thinking, challenge assumptions, and broaden perspectives. We developed and implemented a microbiology CURE for undergraduate biology majors (n = 154) focused on investigating the gut microbiome of leeches. We examined the impact of this experience on students’ perceptions of scientists, scientific research, and leeches. Before the course, students commonly relied on stereotypical descriptions of scientists (i.e., smart, intelligent) and scientific work (e.g., laboratory science). Following participation in the course, we observed a decrease in stereotypical descriptions of scientists, scientific work, and scientist attire, accompanied by an increase in students considering pursuing research in the future. Similarly, students’ descriptions of leeches transitioned from predominantly negative perceptions (e.g., “blood-sucking creatures”) toward recognition of their species diversity and ecological importance. These findings align with previous reports that CUREs broaden students’ perceptions of science and scientists, suggesting that such experiences may support sustained engagement in science and foster scientific literacy across undergraduate populations.

The journal of college science teaching
Southern Utah University (US), Texas State University (US), Georgetown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon