Flytron Electrodynamics and the ZEBTS Framework: From Spectral Primacy to Circuit Theory

We introduce Flytron Electrodynamics (FED), a discrete framework in which electromagnetic structure emerges from a network of coupled oscillators — flytrons — carrying U(1) phases on edges, conjugate momenta, and an evolving kinetic metric. The framework is built from a minimal set of primitives: an evolving graph, an incidence structure satisfying the chain-complex identity BC = 0, and a canonical dynamical system in which the metric weights are slow dynamical variables. The electromagnetic sector requires no additional ontology: the field observables are intrinsic to the discrete U(1) connection, and the homogeneous field laws — the Faraday identity and the absence of magnetic charges — are exact identities of the incidence structure, holding for arbitrary dynamics, parameters and topology. Three results carry the paper. First, topological protection of a spectral invariant: the index I₀ = dim ker L_F of the amplitude-weighted face Laplacian L_F = C^T A^(−1) C is exactly conserved under a working gap hypothesis — a one-directional implication, proved for the canonical class, verified numerically in the proved direction over 5·10⁶ integration steps, and shown to fail exactly when the gap is destroyed (a deliberate no-dealiasing control run). Second, a bifurcation of classical limits: under two metric calibrations, one discrete structure converges to the quasi-static circuit regime (Ohm's law as leading order, telegraph relaxation as first correction) or to the radiative wave regime, both at rate O(h²) on the flat torus — the circuit/wave hierarchy is recovered as a theorem rather than assumed as a phenomenology. Third, a status discipline: every claim of the framework is assigned the weakest status class that supports it — exact, proved, verified, derived within model, assigned, postulate, conditional — with two hypotheses (drift persistence, ζ-correlation) left assigned with pre-announced protocols, and two postulates (dark-sector supremacy, spectral primacy of transport) explicitly delimited. Applications are presented as declared models with graded statuses: a DC-motor model in which the classical characteristic is derived within the declared assumptions; a structural necessary criterion for room-temperature superconductivity (gap above thermal scale, stated in dimensionless form); and a heuristic correspondence for the low-temperature superconducting state, with phase slips modeled by index events. The framework does not replace classical circuit theory or Maxwell theory; classical theories are its two exact limits, and its domain is the regime classical theory does not cover: networks whose geometry itself evolves.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23975568
Primary Topic
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Flytron Electrodynamics and the ZEBTS Framework: From Spectral Primacy to Circuit Theory

Anatolii Mukha
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
preprint

Flytron Electrodynamics and the ZEBTS Framework: From Spectral Primacy to Circuit Theory

Anatolii Mukha
preprint en

Abstract

We introduce Flytron Electrodynamics (FED), a discrete framework in which electromagnetic structure emerges from a network of coupled oscillators — flytrons — carrying U(1) phases on edges, conjugate momenta, and an evolving kinetic metric. The framework is built from a minimal set of primitives: an evolving graph, an incidence structure satisfying the chain-complex identity BC = 0, and a canonical dynamical system in which the metric weights are slow dynamical variables. The electromagnetic sector requires no additional ontology: the field observables are intrinsic to the discrete U(1) connection, and the homogeneous field laws — the Faraday identity and the absence of magnetic charges — are exact identities of the incidence structure, holding for arbitrary dynamics, parameters and topology. Three results carry the paper. First, topological protection of a spectral invariant: the index I₀ = dim ker L_F of the amplitude-weighted face Laplacian L_F = C^T A^(−1) C is exactly conserved under a working gap hypothesis — a one-directional implication, proved for the canonical class, verified numerically in the proved direction over 5·10⁶ integration steps, and shown to fail exactly when the gap is destroyed (a deliberate no-dealiasing control run). Second, a bifurcation of classical limits: under two metric calibrations, one discrete structure converges to the quasi-static circuit regime (Ohm's law as leading order, telegraph relaxation as first correction) or to the radiative wave regime, both at rate O(h²) on the flat torus — the circuit/wave hierarchy is recovered as a theorem rather than assumed as a phenomenology. Third, a status discipline: every claim of the framework is assigned the weakest status class that supports it — exact, proved, verified, derived within model, assigned, postulate, conditional — with two hypotheses (drift persistence, ζ-correlation) left assigned with pre-announced protocols, and two postulates (dark-sector supremacy, spectral primacy of transport) explicitly delimited. Applications are presented as declared models with graded statuses: a DC-motor model in which the classical characteristic is derived within the declared assumptions; a structural necessary criterion for room-temperature superconductivity (gap above thermal scale, stated in dimensionless form); and a heuristic correspondence for the low-temperature superconducting state, with phase slips modeled by index events. The framework does not replace classical circuit theory or Maxwell theory; classical theories are its two exact limits, and its domain is the regime classical theory does not cover: networks whose geometry itself evolves.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon