Speed Control of a DC Motor under Voltage Saturation and Load Disturbance: A Simulation Comparison of P, PI and PID Controllers with Anti-Windup

Speed control of a DC motor is a standard task in cyber-physical systems, yet the behaviour of simple controllers under actuator saturation is often shown only in idealised linear form. This paper compares proportional (P), proportional-integral (PI) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID) speed controllers for a simulated armature-controlled DC motor with a ±24 V voltage limit and a load-torque step. The P controller leaves a steady-state error of 0.091 rad/s on a 1 rad/s reference, whereas integral action removes it (error below 0.001 rad/s). With back-calculation-free clamping anti-windup, the PI controller overshoots by 1.0 %; without anti-windup the overshoot grows to 32.6 %. Adding a derivative term on the measurement reduced the speed dip after the load step by 42 % but did not reduce overshoot in this setting. The study is a simulation with assumed parameters and illustrates design trade-offs rather than a hardware validation. This is a simulation study; all results are outputs of the deposited Python code with assumed parameters. Source code is attached.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23983410
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Design
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Speed Control of a DC Motor under Voltage Saturation and Load Disturbance: A Simulation Comparison of P, PI and PID Controllers with Anti-Windup

Sahetnur Durdyyev, Yslam Orazov, Ezizmuhammet Gurbanmuhammedow
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Control Systems Design
preprint

Speed Control of a DC Motor under Voltage Saturation and Load Disturbance: A Simulation Comparison of P, PI and PID Controllers with Anti-Windup

Sahetnur Durdyyev, Yslam Orazov, Ezizmuhammet Gurbanmuhammedow
preprint en

Abstract

Speed control of a DC motor is a standard task in cyber-physical systems, yet the behaviour of simple controllers under actuator saturation is often shown only in idealised linear form. This paper compares proportional (P), proportional-integral (PI) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID) speed controllers for a simulated armature-controlled DC motor with a ±24 V voltage limit and a load-torque step. The P controller leaves a steady-state error of 0.091 rad/s on a 1 rad/s reference, whereas integral action removes it (error below 0.001 rad/s). With back-calculation-free clamping anti-windup, the PI controller overshoots by 1.0 %; without anti-windup the overshoot grows to 32.6 %. Adding a derivative term on the measurement reduced the speed dip after the load step by 42 % but did not reduce overshoot in this setting. The study is a simulation with assumed parameters and illustrates design trade-offs rather than a hardware validation. This is a simulation study; all results are outputs of the deposited Python code with assumed parameters. Source code is attached.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oguz Han Engineering and Technology University of Turkmenistan (TM)
Advanced Control Systems Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon