Forecasting irrigation water requirement driven by meteorological forecast error correction in the Yellow River irrigation area of Shandong Province

Irrigation water requirement (IWR) is a key parameter in agro-hydrological research and water resource optimization. Its forecast accuracy determines irrigation scheduling reliability, but it is constrained by meteorological errors, which propagate through the modeling chain. An optimal correction scheme was developed for short-term (1–3 days), medium-term (4–15 days), and long-term (16–40 days) forecasts of maximum temperature (T′ max ), minimum temperature (T′ min ), and precipitation (P′) based on 1–40-day public weather forecasts from 2019 to 2023. A regionally calibrated Hargreaves model was evaluated for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET o ), and an IWR forecast method driven by meteorological error correction was established. The results demonstrate that optimal correction methods varied by lead time: the decaying-average method based on autocorrelation function (ACF-DAM) was optimal for T′ max at short lead times; genetic algorithm (GA)-optimized long short-term memory (LSTM) for T′ max at medium-to-long lead times and T′ min at short-to-medium lead times; stepwise regression (SR) for T′ min at long lead times; and Bayesian optimization (BO)-optimized random forest (RF) for P′ across all lead times. ET o forecasts achieved accuracy exceeding 80% at 86.36% of stations across different lead times. ET o predicti o ns ranged from 2.06 to 3.48 mm d −1 , with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 1.22 mm d −1 (short-term), 0.87–0.99 mm d −1 (medium-term), and 1.25–1.32 mm d −1 (long-term). Spatially, the Yellow River Delta and northern plains performed best, while the central region showed larger errors. Across different lead times, IWR forecasts remained stable, with IWR ranging from 145.13 to 293.62 mm for winter wheat and from 31.34 to 239.99 mm for summer maize; station-mean values were 207.11–249.39 mm and 78.21–196.69 mm, respectively. Spatially, IWR was higher in the north and lower in the southwest. Correcting weather forecast errors can significantly reduce the prediction errors of ET o , ET c , and IWR, providing a scientific basis for hydrological regulation, water allocation, and agricultural water demand forecasting in irrigation districts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110912
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Forecasting irrigation water requirement driven by meteorological forecast error correction in the Yellow River irrigation area of Shandong Province

Qian Huang, Zhigong Peng, Xin Li, Baozhong Zhang et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Forecasting irrigation water requirement driven by meteorological forecast error correction in the Yellow River irrigation area of Shandong Province

Qian Huang, Zhigong Peng, Xin Li, Baozhong Zhang, Xin Han, Zhongxin Ma, Kai Zhang, Xin Wang
article en

Abstract

Irrigation water requirement (IWR) is a key parameter in agro-hydrological research and water resource optimization. Its forecast accuracy determines irrigation scheduling reliability, but it is constrained by meteorological errors, which propagate through the modeling chain. An optimal correction scheme was developed for short-term (1–3 days), medium-term (4–15 days), and long-term (16–40 days) forecasts of maximum temperature (T′ max ), minimum temperature (T′ min ), and precipitation (P′) based on 1–40-day public weather forecasts from 2019 to 2023. A regionally calibrated Hargreaves model was evaluated for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET o ), and an IWR forecast method driven by meteorological error correction was established. The results demonstrate that optimal correction methods varied by lead time: the decaying-average method based on autocorrelation function (ACF-DAM) was optimal for T′ max at short lead times; genetic algorithm (GA)-optimized long short-term memory (LSTM) for T′ max at medium-to-long lead times and T′ min at short-to-medium lead times; stepwise regression (SR) for T′ min at long lead times; and Bayesian optimization (BO)-optimized random forest (RF) for P′ across all lead times. ET o forecasts achieved accuracy exceeding 80% at 86.36% of stations across different lead times. ET o predicti o ns ranged from 2.06 to 3.48 mm d −1 , with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 1.22 mm d −1 (short-term), 0.87–0.99 mm d −1 (medium-term), and 1.25–1.32 mm d −1 (long-term). Spatially, the Yellow River Delta and northern plains performed best, while the central region showed larger errors. Across different lead times, IWR forecasts remained stable, with IWR ranging from 145.13 to 293.62 mm for winter wheat and from 31.34 to 239.99 mm for summer maize; station-mean values were 207.11–249.39 mm and 78.21–196.69 mm, respectively. Spatially, IWR was higher in the north and lower in the southwest. Correcting weather forecast errors can significantly reduce the prediction errors of ET o , ET c , and IWR, providing a scientific basis for hydrological regulation, water allocation, and agricultural water demand forecasting in irrigation districts.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 338
Tianjin Agricultural University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Shandong Provincial Water Resources Research Institute (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon