Consensus modeling of sex hormone-binding globulin binding using machine learning and deep learning approaches

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) regulates the bioavailability of circulating androgens and estrogens through high-affinity binding. Chemicals that bind SHBG may alter the equilibrium between bound and free hormone fractions, making SHBG binding activity a relevant endpoint for endocrine disruption assessment. However, experimental assessment of SHBG binding is resource intensive with low throughput, limiting its application to large chemical inventories. To enable large-scale screening, we developed machine learning, deep learning, and consensus models using a dataset of 125 chemicals tested in a human SHBG competitive binding assay. Random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron models were trained using molecular descriptors, while a graph isomorphism network with edge features was trained using molecular graph representations. A consensus model was then generated by averaging the predicted probabilities from the four individual models. Model performance was evaluated using 100 iterations of 5-fold cross-validation and external validation with an independent dataset curated from ChEMBL. All models showed good predictive performance, with accuracy ranging from 0.811 to 0.855 in internal validation and from 0.793–0.890 in external validation. The consensus model had the best overall performance, yielding accuracy of 0.855 and 0.884 in internal and external validations, respectively. Confidence analysis further showed that prediction accuracy increased with prediction confidence, indicating the practical utility of confidence estimates for decision-making. These results indicate that consensus modeling can reliably predict SHBG-binding activity and provide a rapid, cost-effective approach for screening large chemical inventories. The proposed models can support the prioritization of chemicals for experimental testing, facilitate the identification of potential endocrine-disrupting substances, and complement New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) used in chemical safety assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2026.1984441
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Consensus modeling of sex hormone-binding globulin binding using machine learning and deep learning approaches

Tucker A. Patterson, Ann Varghese, Huixiao Hong, Caleb Yu et al.
Frontiers in Chemistry
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Consensus modeling of sex hormone-binding globulin binding using machine learning and deep learning approaches

Tucker A. Patterson, Ann Varghese, Huixiao Hong, Caleb Yu, Wenjing Guo, Jie Liu
article en

Abstract

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) regulates the bioavailability of circulating androgens and estrogens through high-affinity binding. Chemicals that bind SHBG may alter the equilibrium between bound and free hormone fractions, making SHBG binding activity a relevant endpoint for endocrine disruption assessment. However, experimental assessment of SHBG binding is resource intensive with low throughput, limiting its application to large chemical inventories. To enable large-scale screening, we developed machine learning, deep learning, and consensus models using a dataset of 125 chemicals tested in a human SHBG competitive binding assay. Random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron models were trained using molecular descriptors, while a graph isomorphism network with edge features was trained using molecular graph representations. A consensus model was then generated by averaging the predicted probabilities from the four individual models. Model performance was evaluated using 100 iterations of 5-fold cross-validation and external validation with an independent dataset curated from ChEMBL. All models showed good predictive performance, with accuracy ranging from 0.811 to 0.855 in internal validation and from 0.793–0.890 in external validation. The consensus model had the best overall performance, yielding accuracy of 0.855 and 0.884 in internal and external validations, respectively. Confidence analysis further showed that prediction accuracy increased with prediction confidence, indicating the practical utility of confidence estimates for decision-making. These results indicate that consensus modeling can reliably predict SHBG-binding activity and provide a rapid, cost-effective approach for screening large chemical inventories. The proposed models can support the prioritization of chemicals for experimental testing, facilitate the identification of potential endocrine-disrupting substances, and complement New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) used in chemical safety assessment.

Frontiers in ChemistryVol. 14
National Center for Toxicological Research (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon