Low use of guideline-recommended treatment among Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have grown in popularity and currently cover over half of all beneficiaries [1]. Although MA plans offer supplemental benefits and out-of-pocket maximums [2], they also employ numerous strategies to control health care spending. Specifically, MA plans often restrict care to in-network providers and require utilization management (e.g., prior authorization, step therapy) for nearly all self- and clinician-administered anticancer therapies [1]. Evidence suggests that MA enrollment is associated with a low likelihood of starting any or high-cost systemic therapies among beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer [1,3], raising concerns that cost-containment strategies could limit access to guideline-recommended care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2026.104685
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Low use of guideline-recommended treatment among Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer

Joni K. Evans, Meng‐Yun Lin, Jennifer A. Lewis, Shelley A. Jazowski
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Low use of guideline-recommended treatment among Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer

Joni K. Evans, Meng‐Yun Lin, Jennifer A. Lewis, Shelley A. Jazowski
article en

Abstract

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans have grown in popularity and currently cover over half of all beneficiaries [1]. Although MA plans offer supplemental benefits and out-of-pocket maximums [2], they also employ numerous strategies to control health care spending. Specifically, MA plans often restrict care to in-network providers and require utilization management (e.g., prior authorization, step therapy) for nearly all self- and clinician-administered anticancer therapies [1]. Evidence suggests that MA enrollment is associated with a low likelihood of starting any or high-cost systemic therapies among beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer [1,3], raising concerns that cost-containment strategies could limit access to guideline-recommended care.

Journal of Geriatric OncologyVol. 18(2)
Vanderbilt University (US), Veterans Health Administration (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US), Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Low use of guideline-recommended treatment among Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries with advanced lung cancer — Joni K. Evans, Meng‐Yun Lin, et al. · Journal of Geriatric Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS