Beyond the Predicted Profile: Clinical Validity of Artificial Intelligence Based Facial Outcomes in Orthodontics

Introduction and Background: Artificial intelligence is increasingly being explored to predict facial soft tissue outcomes following orthodontic treatment. AI systems may aid in treatment expectations and profile prediction in patients. However, it is important to determine that the predicted outcome is not simply visually accurate.  Review: This narrative review discusses the differences between geometric accuracy, visual accuracy and clinical utility when using AI systems to predict post-orthodontic facial outcomes. Previous research has focused on using artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, deep neural networks and conditional generative adversarial networks. More recently, models have used machine learning with incisors and facial measurements, generative networks for lateral profile prediction and prediction from facial frontal photographs. Across all studies there has been varying success depending on the imaging type, region of interest, patient population and the type of measurement used. Difficulties were seen with predicting lower lip and chin areas. Additionally, even when there has been good success with numbers there has not been improved treatment decisions or outcomes.  Conclusions: Using AI to predict facial outcomes is an emerging field which may be beneficial. However, the clinical validity of the outcomes should be investigated. Future research should ensure independent validation occurs, measurement of error within each anatomical region, patient and clinician evaluation, clear communication of uncertainty and evidence of clinical decision making. Until this evidence is present the outcomes should be used as support.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26oct1554
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Beyond the Predicted Profile: Clinical Validity of Artificial Intelligence Based Facial Outcomes in Orthodontics

Pratap Mane, Seema Patil, Renuka Pawar, Yusuf Ronad et al.
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Beyond the Predicted Profile: Clinical Validity of Artificial Intelligence Based Facial Outcomes in Orthodontics

Pratap Mane, Seema Patil, Renuka Pawar, Yusuf Ronad, Utkarsha U. Chavan, Chanamallappa R. Ganiger, Sandesh Phaphe
article en

Abstract

Introduction and Background: Artificial intelligence is increasingly being explored to predict facial soft tissue outcomes following orthodontic treatment. AI systems may aid in treatment expectations and profile prediction in patients. However, it is important to determine that the predicted outcome is not simply visually accurate.  Review: This narrative review discusses the differences between geometric accuracy, visual accuracy and clinical utility when using AI systems to predict post-orthodontic facial outcomes. Previous research has focused on using artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, deep neural networks and conditional generative adversarial networks. More recently, models have used machine learning with incisors and facial measurements, generative networks for lateral profile prediction and prediction from facial frontal photographs. Across all studies there has been varying success depending on the imaging type, region of interest, patient population and the type of measurement used. Difficulties were seen with predicting lower lip and chin areas. Additionally, even when there has been good success with numbers there has not been improved treatment decisions or outcomes.  Conclusions: Using AI to predict facial outcomes is an emerging field which may be beneficial. However, the clinical validity of the outcomes should be investigated. Future research should ensure independent validation occurs, measurement of error within each anatomical region, patient and clinician evaluation, clear communication of uncertainty and evidence of clinical decision making. Until this evidence is present the outcomes should be used as support.

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)Vol. 11(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon