Rethinking Opioid Prescribing at Surgical Discharge: User-Centered Approach to Clinical Decision Support in the Electronic Health Record

Background: Electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support (CDS) can individualize postoperative opioid prescriptions using inpatient consumption, but clinician acceptance may not translate into guideline-concordant prescribing. We evaluated barriers, adoption, and prescribing fidelity following user-centered CDS redesign. Study Design: We conducted a single-institution, mixed-methods, two-phase pilot at an academic health system. Phase 1 used patient-level randomization between procedure-based and oral morphine equivalent (OME)-based recommendations. Following a 7-month pilot, 20 clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews analyzed using the Sociotechnical Domains Framework. Feedback informed CDS redesign and a second pilot (February–July 2026) across three general surgery teams. Phase 2 outcomes included adoption (CDS order-set use) and fidelity (prescriptions within ±7.5 OME of expected daily requirements). Results: Among 215 Phase 2 encounters, 143 (66.5%) received discharge opioid prescriptions. CDS adoption occurred in 48 of 143 encounters (33.6%), but only 11 of 143 (7.7%) achieved end-to-end fidelity. Among CDS users, 11 of 48 prescriptions (22.9%) matched expected requirements; 25 of 37 nonmatching prescriptions (68%) exceeded them. Among 72 opioid-free discharges, 61 (84.7%) met appropriateness criteria. Phase 1 engagement occurred in 3 of 32 intervention encounters (9.4%). Interviews identified alert fatigue, prescribing habits, rigid taper instructions, fragmented clinical information, and service-level variability as barriers. Phase-specific measures were not directly comparable. Conclusions: Despite clinician acceptance and user-informed redesign, CDS adoption was limited and consumption-concordant prescribing remained uncommon. Measuring adoption alone substantially obscured implementation fidelity. Effective postoperative opioid stewardship may require sustained clinician engagement, workflow integration, and prescribing feedback beyond EHR interface optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000002282
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Rethinking Opioid Prescribing at Surgical Discharge: User-Centered Approach to Clinical Decision Support in the Electronic Health Record

Zhonghui Guan, Tasce Bongiovanni, Hannah C. Decker, Bronwyn J. Southwell et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Rethinking Opioid Prescribing at Surgical Discharge: User-Centered Approach to Clinical Decision Support in the Electronic Health Record

Zhonghui Guan, Tasce Bongiovanni, Hannah C. Decker, Bronwyn J. Southwell, Shraddha Pandey, Elizabeth C. Wick, Jory Purvis, Caroline Erickson, Samuel O'Brien, Genevieve B. Melton
article en

Abstract

Background: Electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support (CDS) can individualize postoperative opioid prescriptions using inpatient consumption, but clinician acceptance may not translate into guideline-concordant prescribing. We evaluated barriers, adoption, and prescribing fidelity following user-centered CDS redesign. Study Design: We conducted a single-institution, mixed-methods, two-phase pilot at an academic health system. Phase 1 used patient-level randomization between procedure-based and oral morphine equivalent (OME)-based recommendations. Following a 7-month pilot, 20 clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews analyzed using the Sociotechnical Domains Framework. Feedback informed CDS redesign and a second pilot (February–July 2026) across three general surgery teams. Phase 2 outcomes included adoption (CDS order-set use) and fidelity (prescriptions within ±7.5 OME of expected daily requirements). Results: Among 215 Phase 2 encounters, 143 (66.5%) received discharge opioid prescriptions. CDS adoption occurred in 48 of 143 encounters (33.6%), but only 11 of 143 (7.7%) achieved end-to-end fidelity. Among CDS users, 11 of 48 prescriptions (22.9%) matched expected requirements; 25 of 37 nonmatching prescriptions (68%) exceeded them. Among 72 opioid-free discharges, 61 (84.7%) met appropriateness criteria. Phase 1 engagement occurred in 3 of 32 intervention encounters (9.4%). Interviews identified alert fatigue, prescribing habits, rigid taper instructions, fragmented clinical information, and service-level variability as barriers. Phase-specific measures were not directly comparable. Conclusions: Despite clinician acceptance and user-informed redesign, CDS adoption was limited and consumption-concordant prescribing remained uncommon. Measuring adoption alone substantially obscured implementation fidelity. Effective postoperative opioid stewardship may require sustained clinician engagement, workflow integration, and prescribing feedback beyond EHR interface optimization.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
University of Minnesota (US), University of California, San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon