Usual preference for public healthcare services in India: a multilevel analysis

During the last few decades, the Government of India has introduced various policies and programmes to achieve the goals of universal health coverage. However, many people do not prefer using public healthcare services. In this context, this study aims to assess the key factors associated with the preference for public healthcare services and to analyse the contributions of different geographical hierarchies to the total variation in preference across the state, district, primary sampling unit (PSU), and household levels. The data were derived from the Indian National Family Health Survey (2019–21). Usual preference for public healthcare services was the dependent variable, and a group of social, economic, demographic, and geographical factors were considered as independent variables. The results of four-level logistic regression models show that the factors are associated with the preference for public healthcare services. The state level accounted for the highest share of the total variation in the usual preference for public healthcare services. This suggests that state-level characteristics may be closely associated with healthcare service choices. This study suggests that state-specific policies and programmes may be effective in expanding the reach of public healthcare services. The household-level factors, such as social groups, religion, place of residence, and other related characteristics, shape the usual preference for public healthcare facilities in India.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1952961
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Usual preference for public healthcare services in India: a multilevel analysis

Sanskriti Maurya, Ambuj Sharma
Frontiers in Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Usual preference for public healthcare services in India: a multilevel analysis

Sanskriti Maurya, Ambuj Sharma
article en

Abstract

During the last few decades, the Government of India has introduced various policies and programmes to achieve the goals of universal health coverage. However, many people do not prefer using public healthcare services. In this context, this study aims to assess the key factors associated with the preference for public healthcare services and to analyse the contributions of different geographical hierarchies to the total variation in preference across the state, district, primary sampling unit (PSU), and household levels. The data were derived from the Indian National Family Health Survey (2019–21). Usual preference for public healthcare services was the dependent variable, and a group of social, economic, demographic, and geographical factors were considered as independent variables. The results of four-level logistic regression models show that the factors are associated with the preference for public healthcare services. The state level accounted for the highest share of the total variation in the usual preference for public healthcare services. This suggests that state-level characteristics may be closely associated with healthcare service choices. This study suggests that state-specific policies and programmes may be effective in expanding the reach of public healthcare services. The household-level factors, such as social groups, religion, place of residence, and other related characteristics, shape the usual preference for public healthcare facilities in India.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon